Contrast sensitivity deficits in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa

被引:33
作者
Alexander, KR
Barnes, CS
Fishman, GA
Pokorny, J
Smith, VC
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1167/iovs.04-0188
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To define the contrast sensitivity deficits of patients with retinitis pigmentosa ( RP) under testing conditions designed to emphasize threshold mediation by either the magnocellular ( MC) or parvocellular (PC) pathway. METHOD. Contrast sensitivity was measured with spatially localized, narrow-band test patterns at peak spatial frequencies ranging from 0.25 to 8 cycles per degree (cpd), using a steady-pedestal paradigm (brief presentation of the test stimulus against a continuously presented luminance pedestal) and a pulsed-pedestal paradigm ( simultaneous brief presentation of the test stimulus and luminance pedestal) to favor the MC and PC pathways, respectively. The contrast sensitivity functions of 12 patients with RP who had visual acuities ranging between 20/12.5 and 20/40 were compared to those of 10 visually normal, age-equivalent control observers. RESULTS. Five of the patients with RP who had Snellen visual acuities better than 20/25 had contrast sensitivity functions that were within the normal limits at all spatial frequencies for both testing paradigms. The other seven patients with RP had reduced contrast sensitivities for both paradigms, with the greatest reduction in sensitivity occurring at the highest spatial frequency. Their contrast sensitivity deficits were equivalent for the steady- and pulsed-pedestal paradigms. CONCLUSIONS. As observed in previous studies, the degree of contrast sensitivity loss shown by the patients with RP was greatest at the highest stimulus spatial frequency. However, in comparison to prior studies of contrast discrimination in patients with RP, there was no evidence of a preferential contrast sensitivity loss within the MC pathway. This apparent discrepancy is attributed to differences in the test targets and psychophysical judgments that were used in the studies, which emphasizes the importance of task characteristics in evaluating relative deficits within the MC and PC processing streams in visual disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:4510 / 4519
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTION IN EVALUATION OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT DUE TO RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA [J].
HYVARINEN, L ;
ROVAMO, J ;
LAURINEN, P ;
PELTOMAA, A .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1981, 59 (05) :763-773
[22]  
Kaplan E., 1990, Progress in Retinal Research, V9, P273, DOI 10.1016/0278-4327(90)90009-7
[23]   Receptive field structure in the primate retina [J].
Lee, BB .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (05) :631-644
[24]  
Lennie P., 2003, SCI COLOR, P217
[25]   Spatial frequency processing in inferred PC- and MC-pathways [J].
Leonova, A ;
Pokorny, J ;
Smith, VC .
VISION RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (20) :2133-2139
[26]   CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA [J].
LINDBERG, CR ;
FISHMAN, GA ;
ANDERSON, RJ ;
VASQUEZ, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1981, 65 (12) :855-858
[27]  
MARMOR MF, 1981, ANN OPHTHALMOL, V13, P1069
[28]   HOW PARALLEL ARE THE PRIMATE VISUAL PATHWAYS [J].
MERIGAN, WH ;
MAUNSELL, JHR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 16 :369-402
[29]  
Peli EP, 2002, DRIVING CONFIDENCE P
[30]   Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain [J].
Pokorny, J ;
Smith, VC .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1997, 14 (09) :2477-2486