Noninvasive coronary artery imaging by multislice spiral computed tomography - A novel approach for a retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction technique

被引:41
|
作者
Sato, Y
Kanmatsuse, K
Inoue, F
Horie, T
Kato, M
Kusama, J
Yoshimura, A
Imazeki, T
Furuhashi, S
Takahashi, M
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Surugadai Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018309, Japan
[2] Nihon Univ, Surugadai Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018309, Japan
关键词
cardiac motion artifact; coronary artery imaging; multislice spiral CT; ANGIOGRAPHY; STENOSES; POSITION; CALCIUM; CT;
D O I
10.1253/circj.67.107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although the excellent spatial resolution of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) enables the coronary arteries to be visualized, its limited temporal resolution results in poor image reproducibility because of cardiac motion artifact (CMA) and hence limits its widespread clinical use. A novel retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction method has been developed to minimize CMA. In 88 consecutive patients, the scan data were reconstructed using 2 retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction methods. Method 1: the end of the reconstruction window (250 ms) was positioned at the peak of the P wave on ECG, which corresponded to the end of the slow filling phase during diastole immediately before atrial contraction. Method 2 (conventional method): relative retrospective gating with 50% referred to the R-R interval was performed so that the beginning of the reconstruction window (250 ms) was positioned at the halfway point between the R-R intervals of the heart cycle. The quality of the coronary artery images was evaluated according to the presence or absence of CMA. The assessment was applied to the left main coronary artery (LMCA), the left anterior descending artery (LAD, segments #6, #7 and #8), the left circumflex artery (LCx, segments #11 and #13) and the right coronary artery (RCA, segments #1, #2 and #3). The first diagonal artery (#9-1), the obtuse marginal artery (#12-1), the posterior descending artery (#4-PD), the atrioventricular node branch (#4-AV) and the first right ventricular branch (RV) were also evaluated. Of the 88 patients, 85 were eligible for image evaluation. Method 1 allowed visualization of the major coronary arteries without CMA in the majority of patients. The LCA system (segments #5-7, #11 and #13) and the proximal portion of the RCA were visualized in more than 94% of patients. Artifact-free visualization of the distal portion of the LAD (segment #8) and RCA (#4PD and #4AV), and side branches (#9-1, #12-1 and RV) was also achieved in more than 80% of patients. On the other hand, CMA occurred frequently on images obtained by Method 2. The LCx and RCA systems were the most affected by CMA, revealing only 41% artifact-free visualization of the segment #13, 39% of #1, 15% of #2 and 32% of #3. Thus, Method 1, which avoids the ventricular motion occurring during the rapid filling and atrial contraction phases, gives superior image quality over the conventional ECG-gated reconstruction method.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 111
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronary artery imaging by multislice, spiral computed tomography: A novel ECG-gated reconstruction technique for the improved image quality
    Furuhashi, S
    Sato, Y
    Inoue, F
    Imazeki, T
    Takahashi, M
    Kanmatsuse, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 483 - 483
  • [2] Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by multislice spiral computed tomography using a new retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction technique - Comparison with angiographic results
    Sato, Y
    Matsumoto, N
    Kato, M
    Inoue, F
    Horie, T
    Kusama, J
    Yoshimura, A
    Imazeki, T
    Fukui, T
    Furuhashi, S
    Takahashi, M
    Kanmatsuse, K
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2003, 67 (05) : 401 - 405
  • [3] Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT
    Achenbach, S
    Ulzheimer, S
    Baum, U
    Kachelriess, M
    Ropers, D
    Giesler, T
    Bautz, W
    Daniel, WG
    Kalender, WA
    Moshage, W
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (23) : 2823 - 2828
  • [4] Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery plaque with ECG-gated multislice computed tomography
    Matsuo, S
    Nakamura, Y
    Matsumoto, T
    Nakae, I
    Koh, T
    Horie, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 363A - 364A
  • [5] The accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography using a novel ECG-Gated image reconstruction method for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis
    Horie, T
    Sato, Y
    Kato, M
    Inoue, F
    Imazeki, T
    Yoshimura, A
    Matsumoto, N
    Takahashi, M
    Kanmatsuse, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 421A - 421A
  • [6] Comparison of coronary artery diameters in retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT and quantitative coronary angiography
    Giesler, T
    Achenbach, S
    Ropers, D
    Baum, U
    Kachelriess, M
    Ulzheimer, S
    Bautz, W
    Moshage, W
    Daniel, WG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 447A - 447A
  • [7] Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice spiral computed tomography: Initial clinical experiences
    Ropers, D
    Anders, K
    Baum, U
    Bautz, W
    Daniel, WG
    Achenbach, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 311A - 311A
  • [8] Coronary artery aneurysm and type-A aortic dissection demonstrated by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT
    Eva Fallenberg
    Kai Juergens
    Thomas Wichter
    Hans H. Scheld
    Roman Fischbach
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 201 - 204
  • [9] Coronary artery aneurysm and type-A aortic dissection demonstrated by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT
    Fallenberg, EM
    Juergens, KU
    Wichter, T
    Scheld, HH
    Fischbach, R
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 201 - 204
  • [10] Coronary artery bypass graft imaging using ECG-gated multislice computed tomography: Comparison with catheter angiography
    Moore, RKG
    Sampson, C
    MacDonald, S
    Moynahan, C
    Groves, D
    Chester, MR
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (09) : 990 - 998