rTMS with a two-coil array: Safety and efficacy for treatment resistant major depressive disorder

被引:29
作者
Carpenter, Linda L. [1 ]
Aaronson, Scott T. [2 ]
Clarke, Gregory N. [3 ]
Holtzheimer, Paul E. [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Clark W. [6 ]
McDonald, William M. [7 ]
Stannard, Elizabeth L. [8 ]
Schneider, M. Bret [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Butler Hosp, Brown Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, 345 Blackstone Blvd, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[2] Sheppard Pratt Hlth Syst Clin Res Programs, 6501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21204 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[4] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Psychiat, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[5] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Surg, 1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[6] PRA Hlth Sci, 3838 South 700 East,Suite 202, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Brain Hlth Ctr, 12 Execut Pk Dr NE,Floor 5, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[8] Rio Grande Neurosci Inc, 600 Cent SE,Ste 221, Albequerque, NM 87102 USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[10] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, 213 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Depression; Randomized clinical trial; Multiple coil array; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; MULTISITE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2017.06.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Therapeutic repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a standard of care for individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who do not benefit from, or are unable to tolerate, antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Depth of stimulation is limited with currently approved figure-eight coils and larger coils capable of deeper penetration may be associated with loss of stimulation focality and undesired recruitment of motor cortex. A second generation 2-coil array rTMS system was designed to target converging brain pathways for potentially deeper prefrontal cortex stimulation. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial examined the safety and efficacy of an investigational 2-coil rTMS device. Antidepressant treatment-resistant or treatment-intolerant MDD patients (n = 92) received 20 daily rTMS treatments with coil centers positioned over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). 10 Hz stimulation (maximum summated power for both coils <= 120% motor threshold) was delivered. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HAMD-24 score from baseline to the conclusion of treatments. Results: Data from n = 75 (per-protocol sample) showed significantly greater improvement (mean HAMD-24 change) over time for the active (n = 38) versus sham (n = 37) group after 20 sessions (F = 7.174; p = 0.008) and also at the one-month follow-up (F = 6.748; p = 0.010). Response rates were 55.3% (active) versus 32.4% (sham) (p = 0.063); remission rates were 26.3% versus 18.9% (p > 0.05). Other secondary outcomes were generally supportive. Conclusions: The results confirmed safety and acute efficacy of the 2-coil rTMS device. Despite modest sample size, primary outcome was clinically and statistically significant, and the effect size was comparable with those reported for regulatory trials with FDA-cleared devices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 933
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale [J].
Altman, EG ;
Hedeker, D ;
Peterson, JL ;
Davis, JM .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (10) :948-955
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[3]   Assessment of blinding in clinical trials [J].
Bang, HJ ;
Ni, LY ;
Davis, CE .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2004, 25 (02) :143-156
[4]   EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF HIGH FREQUENCY REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION (rTMS) VERSUS ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY (ECT) FOR MAJOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
Berlim, Marcelo T. ;
Van den Eynde, Frederique ;
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2013, 30 (07) :614-623
[5]   Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Berlim, Marcelo T. ;
Broadbent, Hannah J. ;
Van den Eynde, Frederique .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 16 (05) :1173-1181
[6]  
by the CNS SUMMIT DATA QUALITY MONITORING WORKGROUP CORE MEMBERS, 2016, Innov Clin Neurosci, V13, P27
[7]   Validation of the Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire (ATRQ) [J].
Chandler, Gregory M. ;
Iosifescu, Dan V. ;
Pollack, Mark H. ;
Targum, Steven D. ;
Fava, Maurizio .
CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 16 (05) :322-325
[8]   Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs [J].
Deng, Zhi-De ;
Lisanby, Sarah H. ;
Peterchev, Angel V. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (01) :1-13
[9]   Coil Design Considerations for Deep-Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) [J].
Deng, Zhi-De ;
Peterchev, Angel V. ;
Lisanby, Sarah H. .
2008 30TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-8, 2008, :5675-+
[10]  
ENDICOTT J, 1993, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V29, P321