SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit

被引:6
|
作者
Silva, Joao M., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Costa Rocha, Helder Marcus [1 ]
Katayama, Henrique Tadashi [1 ]
Dias, Leandro Ferreira [1 ]
de Paula, Mateus Barros [1 ]
Romano Andraus, Leusi Magda [1 ]
Correa Silva, Jose Maria [1 ]
Sa Malbouisson, Luiz Marcelo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Servidor Publ Estadual SP, Rua Pedro Toledo,1800-6 A Vila Clementino, BR-04039901 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Clin SP FMUSP, Dept Anaesthesiol, Av Dr Eneas Carvalho Aguiar,255 Cerqueira Cesar, BR-05403000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE | 2016年 / 6卷
关键词
Surgical patients; Risk; Intensive care unit; Criteria; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION; PROGNOSTIC MODEL; APACHE-II; ADMISSION; MORTALITY; BEDS; CLASSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-016-0129-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing intermediate-risk surgery are typically taken to the ward postoperatively. However, some may develop complications requiring intensive care later. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients undergoing intermediate-risk surgery who required late postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and determine the predictors for this. Methods: The study included patients undergoing intermediate-risk surgery with preoperative indication for ICU but who were taken to the ward postoperatively, because they appeared to be responding well. However, they required late ICU admission. ICU care and preoperative SAPS 3 score were evaluated. Palliative surgeries and patients readmitted to ICU were excluded. Results: The study included 100 patients, 27 % of whom had late postoperative admission to the ICU. The preoperative SAPS 3 score was higher (45.4 +/- 7.8 vs. 35.9 +/- 7.4, P < 0.001) in patients who required delayed admission to the ICU postoperatively. Furthermore, they had undergone longer surgery (4.2 +/- 1.9 vs. 2.7 +/- 1.5 h, P < 0.001), and a greater proportion were gastrointestinal surgeries (14.8 vs. 5.5 %, P = 0.03) and intraoperative transfusion (18.5 vs. 5.5 % P = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, preoperative SAPS 3 and surgery duration independently predicted postoperative ICU admission, respectively (OR 1.25; 95 % CI 1.1-1.4 and OR 3.33; 95 % CI 1.7-6.3). Conclusion: The identification of high-risk surgical patients is essential for proper treatment; time of surgery and preoperative SAPS 3 seem to provide a useful indication of risk and may help better to characterize patients undergoing intermediate-risk surgery that demand ICU care.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit
    João M. Silva
    Helder Marcus Costa Rocha
    Henrique Tadashi Katayama
    Leandro Ferreira Dias
    Mateus Barros de Paula
    Leusi Magda Romano Andraus
    Jose Maria Correa Silva
    Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson
    Annals of Intensive Care, 6
  • [2] Is the SAPS II score valid in surgical intensive care unit patients?
    Sakr, Yasser
    Marques, Juliana
    Mortsch, Stefan
    Gonsalves, Matheus Demarchi
    Hekmat, Khosro
    Kabisch, Bjorn
    Kohl, Matthias
    Reinhart, Konrad
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (02) : 231 - 237
  • [3] The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit
    Khwannimit, Bodin
    Bhurayanontachai, Rungsun
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (02) : 342 - 346
  • [4] A comparison of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in a Norwegian intensive care unit population
    Strand, K.
    Soreide, E.
    Aardal, S.
    Flaatten, H.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 53 (05) : 595 - 600
  • [5] The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit
    Bodin Khwannimit
    Rungsun Bhurayanontachai
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2010, 36 : 342 - 346
  • [6] SAPS III or APACHE IV: Which score to choose for acute trauma patients in intensive care unit?
    Toker, Melike Korkmaz
    Gulleroglu, Aykan
    Karabay, Ayse Gul
    Bicer, Ilhan Guney
    Demiraran, Yavuz
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2019, 25 (03): : 247 - 252
  • [7] Comparison between the SAPS 3 and APACHE II score in a general intensive care unit in Brazil
    CJ Alves
    GPP Franco
    MSD Coelho
    MS Gallina
    PB Santos
    M Andraus
    SP Souza
    Critical Care, 11 (Suppl 3):
  • [8] Validation of SAPS3 admission score and its customization for use in Korean intensive care unit patients: A prospective multicentre study
    Lim, So Yeon
    Koh, Shin Ok
    Jeon, Kyeongman
    Na, Sungwon
    Lim, Chae-Man
    Choi, Won-Il
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Kim, Seok Chan
    Chon, Gyu Rak
    Kim, Je Hyeong
    Kim, Jae Yeol
    Lim, Jaemin
    Rhee, Chin Kook
    Park, Sunghoon
    Kim, Ho Cheol
    Lee, Jin Hwa
    Lee, Ji Hyun
    Park, Jisook
    Koh, Younsuck
    Suh, Gee Young
    RESPIROLOGY, 2013, 18 (06) : 989 - 995
  • [9] Post-intensive care unit respiratory failure in older patients liberated from intensive care unit and ventilator: The predictive value of the National Early Warning Score on intensive care unit discharge
    Chen, Yu-Chun
    Yu, Wen-Kuang
    Ko, Hsin-Kuo
    Pan, Sheng-Wei
    Chen, Yen-Wen
    Ho, Li-Ing
    Bien, Mauo-Ying
    Wang, Jia-Horng
    Chan, Yu-Jiun
    Kou, Yu Ru
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 19 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [10] Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population
    Jentzer, Jacob C.
    Bennett, Courtney
    Wiley, Brandon M.
    Murphree, Dennis H.
    Keegan, Mark T.
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Wright, R. Scott
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (06):