Shape optimization of underwater glider based on approximate model technology

被引:55
作者
Yang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanhui [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Shaoqiong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lianhong [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Jiajun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Key Lab Mech Theory & Equipment Design, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Pilot Natl Lab Marine Sci & Technol Qingdao, Joint Lab Ocean Observing & Detect, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Shape optimization; Underwater glider; Approximate model; DEFORMATION; STRATEGY; FORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.apor.2021.102580
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Hydrodynamic shape is an important factor of underwater glider (UG), which influences its gliding efficiency and energy consumption. This paper proposes a shape optimization method of Petrel-L based on the approximate model technology, the establishment of which is introduced in detail. The approximate models used in the hull generatrix optimization and the wing dimension optimization take the complex coupling relationship among the shape dimensions into account. Based on the established models, the sensitivity analysis is carried out to analyze the effect of the shape dimensions on the hydrodynamic performance. The hull generatrix optimization and the wing dimension optimization are executed to minimize the drag coefficient and maximize the gliding range per energy consumption respectively. In consideration of the different sensors carried by UGs and the specific pitching angle requirement in the observation missions, the optimal wing dimensions are obtained under different hotel loads and pitching angles. The optimization results indicate that the increase rate of gliding range can reach 7.64% when the hotel load is 0.5 W and the pitching angle is ?12?. The shape optimization method in this paper is appropriate for other UGs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Andrew S., 2016, FRONT ROBOT AI
[2]  
Andy A, 2008, ENG DESIGN VIA SURRO
[3]   Numerical analysis of control surface effects on AUV manoeuvrability [J].
Dantas, J. L. D. ;
de Barros, E. A. .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2013, 42 :168-181
[4]   Glider performance analysis and intermediate-fidelity modelling of underwater vehicles [J].
Deutsch, Clemens ;
Kuttenkeuler, Jakob ;
Melin, Tomas .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 210
[5]   Seaglider: A long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research [J].
Eriksen, CC ;
Osse, TJ ;
Light, RD ;
Wen, T ;
Lehman, TW ;
Sabin, PL ;
Ballard, JW ;
Chiodi, AM .
IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 26 (04) :424-436
[6]   Multi-objective shape optimization of autonomous underwater glider based on fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm [J].
Fu, Xiaoyun ;
Lei, Lei ;
Yang, Gang ;
Li, Baoren .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 157 :339-349
[7]   Hull shape optimization for autonomous underwater vehicles using CFD [J].
Gao, Ting ;
Wang, Yaxing ;
Pang, Yongjie ;
Cao, Jian .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2016, 10 (01) :599-607
[8]  
Goldberg DE, 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
[9]   Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems [J].
Helton, JC ;
Davis, FJ .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 81 (01) :23-69
[10]   Effect of wing form on the hydrodynamic characteristics and dynamic stability of an underwater glider [J].
Javaid, Muhammad Yasar ;
Ovinis, Mark ;
Hashim, Fakhruldin B. M. ;
Maimun, Adi ;
Ahmed, Yasser M. ;
Ullah, Barkat .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (04) :382-389