Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arm's-length bodies as boundary organisations

被引:16
作者
Boswell, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
POLICY AND POLITICS | 2018年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
boundary work; science and technology studies; administrative reform; agencies; POLITICS; SCIENCE; WORK;
D O I
10.1332/030557317X15052303355719
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Policy and administration scholars have struggled to explain the waxing and waning of arm's-length bodies over time and across contexts. This article draws on the science and technology studies's concept of boundary work - understood as practices which both demarcate and enable collaboration across distinct areas of expertise - to help explain variation in these institutional arrangements. Conceptualising arm's-length bodies as boundary organisations shows how their authority rests on their capacity to enable ongoing coordination while preserving the authority and autonomy of relevant expert spheres. The article demonstrates this analytical purchase through reference to two cases in contemporary British government.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 501
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CRIT POLICY STUD, DOI DOI 10.1080/19460171.2008.9518531
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SCI PUBL POLICY, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154399781782482
[3]  
[Anonymous], GOV RESP HLTH SEL CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION 0508
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GOVT AGENCIES PRACTI
[6]  
[Anonymous], DAILY TELEGRAPH
[7]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking without Order
[9]  
[Anonymous], WHO ACC REL GOV ARMS
[10]  
[Anonymous], NICE 2 PROV APPR DET