The Effect of Apical Vertebra Position on Growing Rod Treatment: A Clinical and Finite Element Study

被引:2
作者
Dursun, Gokay [1 ]
Cetik, Riza M. [4 ]
Guzel, Dilek [2 ]
Demirkiran, Halil Gokhan [1 ]
Ramazanov, Rafik [3 ]
Dede, Ozgur [5 ]
Gurses, Ercan [2 ]
Yazici, Muharrem [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, TR-06230 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Cankaya Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Sandikli State Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Afyon, Turkey
[5] UPMC Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 06230 USA
关键词
spine; early-onset scoliosis; growing rods; distraction; apex vertebra; finite element analysis; POSTERIOR DISTRACTION; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SCOLIOSIS; GROWTH; FUSION; INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0000000000002135
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Growing rods (GRs) is a commonly utilized technique for the management of early-onset scoliosis. The significance of the position of the apical vertebrae relative to the rods is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential effects of the position of the apical vertebrae in relation to the GRs on deformity control through plain radiographs and finite element analysis (FEA) modeling. Methods: We identified 140 patients treated with GR between 2000 and 2018. Patients who had a congenital vertebral anomaly or <2-year follow-up were excluded. Curve magnitude, traction radiograph under general anesthesia (TRUGA) flexibility, apical rotation, the lengths of T1-12, T1-S1, and the instrumented segments were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the apical position on the postoperative radiographs: group 1 (both pedicles are between the rods), group 2 (convex rod is between the apical vertebra pedicles), group 3 (both pedicles are lateral to the convex rod). FEA models were created simulating the 3 groups. Both radiographic and FEA data were analyzed to compare the deformity control and growth in each group. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analyses (mean age 84 mo; range: 38 to 148). Ten patients (17%) were in group 1, 34 (59%) in group 2, and 14 (24%) in group 3. Difference between TRUGA flexibilities was statistically insignificant. Group 3 was the least successful in terms of both height gain and rotational control. FEA showed a decrease in rotation and displacement for every group, however, the residual rotation and displacement was highest in group 3. Conclusions: Bringing the apex in line with the GR increases the capacity of growth preservation as it results in largest height gain and better deformity control. FEA model demonstrated that distraction alone is inadequate for controlling rotation, and with increasing apical translation, residual rotation after distraction also increases.
引用
收藏
页码:E552 / E558
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Effect of distraction force on growth and biomechanics of the spine: A finite element study on normal juvenile spine with dual growth rod instrumentation
    Agarwal A.
    Agarwal A.K.
    Jayaswal A.
    Goel V.K.
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (4) : 260 - 269
  • [2] Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion - The effect of frequency of lengthening
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Breakwell, Lee M.
    Marks, David S.
    McCarthy, Richard E.
    Thompson, Alistair G.
    Canale, Sarah K.
    Kostial, Patricia N.
    Tambe, Anant
    Asher, Marc A.
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (09) : 984 - 990
  • [3] Early Results of a Management Algorithm for Collapsing Spine Deformity in Young Children (Below 10-Year Old) With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type II
    Bekmez, Senol
    Dede, Ozgur
    Yataganbaba, Alper
    Demirkiran, Halil G.
    Yazici, Muharrem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (06) : E413 - E419
  • [4] Is Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod the Game Changer in Early-onset Scoliosis? A Preliminary Report
    Bekmez, Senol
    Afandiyev, Ayaz
    Dede, Ozgur
    Karaismailoglu, Eda
    Demirkiran, Halil G.
    Yazici, Muharrem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 39 (03) : E195 - E200
  • [5] The effect of magnetically controlled growing rods on three-dimensional changes in deformity correction
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang
    Cheung, Kenneth M. C.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2020, 8 (03) : 537 - 546
  • [6] Growing rod technique with prior foundation surgery and sublaminar taping for early-onset scoliosis
    Chiba, Takafumi
    Inami, Satoshi
    Moridaira, Hiroshi
    Takeuchi, Daisaku
    Sorimachi, Tsuyoshi
    Ueda, Haruki
    Ohe, Makoto
    Aoki, Hiromichi
    Iimura, Takuya
    Nohara, Yutaka
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 33 (05) : 607 - 612
  • [7] Convex Instrumented Hemiepiphysiodesis With Concave Distraction: A Treatment Option for Long Sweeping Congenital Curves
    Demirkiran, Gokhan
    Dede, Ozgur
    Ayvaz, Mehmet
    Bas, Can E.
    Alanay, Ahmet
    Yazici, Muharrem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 36 (03) : 226 - 231
  • [8] Letter to the Editor
    Ron El-Hawary
    Behrooz A. Akbarnia
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2015, 3 (2) : 105 - 106
  • [9] Respiratory function and cosmesis at maturity in infantile-onset scoliosis
    Goldberg, CJ
    Gillic, I
    Connaughton, O
    Moore, DP
    Orth, MC
    Fogarty, EE
    Canny, GJ
    Dowling, FE
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (20) : 2397 - 2406
  • [10] Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Hamzaoglu, A
    Talu, U
    Tezer, M
    Mirzanli, C
    Domanic, U
    Goksan, SB
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) : 1637 - 1642