The use and quality of reporting of Rasch analysis in nursing research: A methodological scoping review

被引:26
作者
Stolt, Minna [1 ]
Kottorp, Anders [2 ]
Suhonen, Riitta [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Malmo Univ, Fac Hlth & Soc, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[4] City Turku, Welf Div, Turku, Finland
关键词
Nursing; Psychometrics; Rasch analysis; Reproducibility of results; Scoping review; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; OF-LIFE; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT; OUTCOME EXPECTATIONS; SELF-EFFICACY; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; CARE; NURSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104244
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Rasch analysis is widely used in the life sciences. Rasch analysis is a mathematical and probabilistic model based on the assumption that the probability of passing a single item is governed by a person's ability and the difficulty of the item. However, its use in nursing science remains unclear. Aim: To (i) describe the use of Rasch analysis in nursing research and (ii) determine the quality of reporting in nursing studies using Rasch models. Methods: A methodological scoping review of literature was conducted. The systematic electronic literature search was initially conducted on 1 February 2020 and updated on 16 April 2021 from PubMed/Medline and CINAHL databases. The search was limited to covering the timeframe from the earliest literature available until 31 December 2020. The search terms used were Rasch, IRT, item response theory, and nursing. The search was limited to the English language and title/abstract level. The analysis included quantification and content analysis. Results: In total, 388 hits were identified. Following a two-phase retrieval process, 88 articles were included in the final analysis. Rasch analysis was used to test the psychometric properties of the newly developed instrument, and validate or test a short version of the existing instrument. The reporting of Rasch analysis demonstrated large variability in quality. Rating scale functioning, internal scale validity using goodness-of-fit statistics, and unidimensionality were the most frequently reported outcomes. Conclusion: The use of Rasch analysis in nursing science was found to be unsystematic. Rasch analysis could provide new possibilities for investigating measurement properties. However, robust, comprehensive, and precise reporting of the methodological choices and results of Rasch analysis is needed. Furthermore, the use of Rasch analysis in nursing science is encouraged. What is already known Rasch analysis is a mathematical and probabilistic model based on the assumption that the probability of passing a single item is related to a person's ability and the difficulty of the item. Rasch analysis is widely used in the life sciences. However, its use and quality of reporting in nursing science have yet to be explored. What this paper adds Rasch analysis is rarely used in nursing science, although its use is increasing. This review has identified deficiencies in the reporting of nursing validation studies using Rasch analysis. Minimum standards for the reporting of Rasch analysis in nursing research are proposed. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 126 条
[91]   Testing the reliability and validity of self-efficacy and outcome expectations of restorative care performed by nursing assistants [J].
Resnick, Barbara ;
Galik, Elizabeth ;
Pretzer-Aboff, Ingrid ;
Rogers, Valerie ;
Gruber-Baldini, Ann L. .
JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2008, 23 (02) :162-169
[92]   Measuring restorative care provided by nursing assistants: Reliability and validity of the Restorative Care Behavior Checklist [J].
Resnick, Barbara ;
Rogers, Valerie ;
Galik, Elizabeth ;
Gruber-Baldini, Ann L. .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 56 (06) :387-398
[93]   Reliability and validity of the evaluation to sign consent measure [J].
Resnick, Barbara ;
Gruber-Baldim, Ann L. ;
Pretzer-Aboff, Ingrid ;
Galik, Elizabeth ;
Buie, Verita Custis ;
Russ, Karin ;
Zimmerman, Sheryl .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2007, 47 (01) :69-77
[94]   Reliability and Validity of the Knowledge of Person-Centered Behavioral Approaches for BPSD Test [J].
Resnick, Barbara ;
Kolanowski, Ann ;
Van Haitsma, Kimberly ;
Galik, Elizabeth ;
Boltz, Marie ;
Ellis, Jeanette ;
Behrens, Liza ;
Eshraghi, Karen ;
Viviano, Nicole ;
Madrigal, Caroline .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2020, 28 (03) :472-488
[95]   Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale [J].
Resnick, Barbara ;
Galik, Elizabeth ;
Kolanowski, Ann ;
Van Haitsma, Kimberly ;
Boltz, Marie ;
Ellis, Jeanette ;
Behrens, Liza ;
Flanagan, Nina M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2018, 33 (05) :277-283
[96]   Measuring the validity and reliability of the Lithuanian missed nursing care in infection prevention and control scales using Rasch analysis [J].
Riklikiene, Olga ;
Blackman, Ian ;
Bendinskaite, Irmina ;
Henderson, Julie ;
Willis, Eileen .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (08) :2025-2035
[97]   Usefulness of the Diagnosis "Decreased Cardiac Output (00029)" in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [J].
Rojas Sanchez, Lyda Zoraya ;
Hernandez Vargas, Juliana Alexandra ;
Trujillo Caceres, Silvia Juliana ;
Roa Diaz, Zayne Milena ;
Jurado Arenales, Adriana Milena ;
Toloza Perez, Yesith Guillermo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2017, 28 (04) :192-198
[98]  
Salzberger T., 2013, RASCH MODELS HLTH
[99]   Adaptation and validation of the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale amongst nurses in Turkey [J].
Samur, Menevse ;
Intepeler, Seyda Seren ;
Lam, Simon Ching .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (03)
[100]   Validation of an instrument for measuring satisfaction of patients undergoing hemodialysis [J].
Sanabria-Arenas, Mauricio ;
Tobon-Marin, Julia ;
Claudia Certuche-Quintana, Maria ;
Sanchez-Pedraza, Ricardo .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17