Adaptation of the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) in adult population of the City of Buenos Aires and the Greater Buenos Aires

被引:0
作者
Emilio Pagano, Alejandro [1 ]
Alejandro Vizioli, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
PSICODEBATE-PSICOLOGIA CULTURA Y SOCIEDAD | 2021年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
emotion regulation; cognitive reassessment; expressive suppression; ERQ adaptation; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.18682/pd.v21i1.3881
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study consisted of the linguistic, conceptual, and metric adaptation of the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003). It is a self-report measure made up of 10 items that allow the evaluation of two Emotional Regulation strategies: cognitive re-evaluation (6 items) and expressive suppression (4 items). To carry out the adaptation, a direct translation of the questionnaire from English to Spanish was performed, followed by an expert judgment procedure and a reagent discrimination analysis. Then, a factor structure of this version was analyzed with confirmatory factor analyses in a sample composed of 250 adults between 18 and 63 years (M = 32.28, SD = 11.74), residents from Buenos Aires City and Greater Buenos Aires. Finally, evidence of the reliability of the instrument was sought and normative values were established. The results indicate that the adapted version of the ERQ presents adequate content validity (percentages of agreement between .80 and 1), adequate factorial validity for the model of two independent factors S-B chi(2) (27) = 61.98, NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA (.05 -.10) = .07, AIC = 7.98, showing acceptable internal consistency indices (a ordinal = .81 and. ordinal = .87 for the cognitive reappraisal factor; and a ordinal = .71 and omega ordinal = .79 for the expressive suppression factor.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 32
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]   The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Validation of the ERQ-9 in Two Community Samples [J].
Spaapen, Devon L. ;
Waters, Flavie ;
Brummer, Laura ;
Stopa, Lusia ;
Bucks, Romola S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 26 (01) :46-54
[52]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY AND AGREEMENT OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENTS [J].
TINSLEY, HEA ;
WEISS, DJ .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 22 (04) :358-376
[53]  
Voutilainen P., 1995, HOITOTIEDE, V7, P51
[54]  
Wiltink J., 2001, GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, V8, DOI DOI 10.3205/PSM000078
[55]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[56]  
Zamora Munoz S., 2009, SISTEMA ECUACIONES E
[57]  
Zumbo BD., 2012, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V17, P3, DOI DOI 10.7275/N560-J767