The prevention of female genital mutilation in England: what can be done?

被引:10
作者
Plugge, E. [1 ]
Adam, S. [2 ]
El Hindi, L. [2 ]
Gitau, J. [2 ]
Shodunke, N. [2 ]
Mohamed-Ahmed, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med & Global Hlth, Nuffield Dept Med, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3SY, England
[2] Ctr Trop Med & Global Hlth, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Old Rd Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
关键词
community engagement; female genital mutilation; prevention; women;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdy128
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a global public health issue. Women in the UK are at risk of FGM and its adverse health consequences but little is known about its practice. Since 1985 it has been a criminal offence to perform FGM in the UK and further legislation has tightened the law but FGM continues. Methods Four community researchers from the Kenyan, Nigerian, Somalian and Sudanese communities in Oxford conducted focus groups and interviews with 53 people to understand the communities' beliefs about how best to prevent FGM. Results Participants believed that the current UK legislation alone was not sufficient to tackle FGM and might in fact be counterproductive by alienating communities through its perceived imposition. They felt that there had been insufficient consultation with affected communities, awareness raising and education about the legislation. Community-led solutions were the most effective way to tackle FGM. Conclusions FGM adversely affects communities globally. In the UK, researchers from affected communities gathered data demonstrating the feasibility and importance of involving communities in FGM prevention work. Further research is needed to understand how best to prevent FGM in affected communities and, very importantly, to examine the impact of the UK legislation relating to FGM.
引用
收藏
页码:E261 / E266
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PILOT TOOLKIT REPLAC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, OXFORDSHIRE SAFEGUAR
  • [3] Banks E, 2006, LANCET, V367, P1835, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3
  • [4] Berg RC, 2010, 132010 NAS KUNNSK HE
  • [5] Brown E., 2016, The Tackling FGM Initiative: Evaluation of the Second Phase (2013-2016)
  • [6] Denison E., 2009, Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Reduce the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
  • [7] Fitzpatrick R, 1994, Qual Health Care, V3, P107
  • [8] When female circumcision comes to the West: Attitudes toward the practice among Somali Immigrants in Oslo
    Gele, Abdi A.
    Johansen, Elise B.
    Sundby, Johanne
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
  • [9] Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study
    Gele, Abdi A.
    Kumar, Bernadette
    Hjelde, Karin Harslof
    Sundby, Johanne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 4 : 7 - 17
  • [10] Failure to evaluate introduction of female genital mutilation mandatory reporting
    Gerry, Felicity
    Rowland, Andrew
    Fowles, Sam
    Smith, Suzanne
    Hodes, Deborah
    Creighton, Sarah
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2016, 101 (08) : 778 - U102