Application of dose kernel calculation using a simplified Monte Carlo method to treatment plan for scanned proton beams

被引:1
|
作者
Mizutani, Shohei [1 ]
Takada, Yoshihisa [1 ]
Kohno, Ryosuke [2 ]
Hotta, Kenji [2 ]
Tansho, Ryohei [1 ]
Akimoto, Tetsuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Pure & Appl Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Res Ctr Innovat Oncol, Particle Therapy Div, Chiba, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
dose kernel calculation; simplified Monte Carlo method; treatment planning system; nasopharyngeal tumor case; proton pencil beam scanning; PARTICLE THERAPY; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; SYSTEM; IRRADIATION; ALGORITHM; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5747
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Full Monte Carlo (FMC) calculation of dose distribution has been recognized to have superior accuracy, compared with the pencil beam algorithm (PBA). However, since the FMC methods require long calculation time, it is difficult to apply them to routine treatment planning at present. In order to improve the situation, a simplified Monte Carlo (SMC) method has been introduced to the dose kernel calculation applicable to dose optimization procedure for the proton pencil beam scanning. We have evaluated accuracy of the SMC calculation by comparing a result of the dose kernel calculation using the SMC method with that using the FMC method in an inhomogeneous phantom. The dose distribution obtained by the SMC method was in good agreement with that obtained by the FMC method. To assess the usefulness of SMC calculation in clinical situations, we have compared results of the dose calculation using the SMC with those using the PBA method for three clinical cases of tumor treatment. The dose distributions calculated with the PBA dose kernels appear to be homogeneous in the planning target volumes (PTVs). In practice, the dose distributions calculated with the SMC dose kernels with the spot weights optimized with the PBA method show largely inhomogeneous dose distributions in the PTVs, while those with the spot weights optimized with the SMC method have moderately homogeneous distributions in the PTVs. Calculation using the SMC method is faster than that using the GEANT4 by three orders of magnitude. In addition, the graphic processing unit (GPU) boosts the calculation speed by 13 times for the treatment planning using the SMC method. Thence, the SMC method will be applicable to routine clinical treatment planning for reproduction of the complex dose distribution more accurately than the PBA method in a reasonably short time by use of the GPU-based calculation engine.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 327
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Proton therapy dose distribution comparison between Monte Carlo and a treatment planning system for pediatric patients with ependymoma
    Jia, Yingcui
    Beltran, Chris
    Indelicato, Daniel J.
    Flampouri, Stella
    Li, Zuofeng
    Merchant, Thomas E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) : 4742 - 4747
  • [32] Optimizing dose prescription in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumours using Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Widder, Joachim
    Hollander, Miranda
    Ubbels, Jan F.
    Bolt, Rene A.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [33] MOTION-INDUCED MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATION USING DEFORMABLE TETRAHEDRAL MESHES
    Touileb, Yazid
    Manescu, Petru
    Ladjal, Hamid
    Azencot, Joseph
    Beuve, Michael
    Shariat, Behzad
    2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 1257 - 1260
  • [34] Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom
    Schreuder, Andries N.
    Bridges, Daniel S.
    Rigsby, Lauren
    Blakey, Marc
    Janson, Martin
    Hedrick, Samantha G.
    Wilkinson, John B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (12): : 127 - 137
  • [35] Validation of a deep learning-based material estimation model for Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton therapy
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Zhou, Shuang
    Gao, Yuan
    Lin, Liyong
    Liu, Tian
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Zhang, Tiezhi
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (21)
  • [36] Virtual particle Monte Carlo: A new concept to avoid simulating secondary particles in proton therapy dose calculation
    Shan, Jie
    Feng, Hongying
    Morales, Danairis Hernandez
    Patel, Samir H.
    Wong, William W.
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Bues, Martin
    Schild, Steven E.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (10) : 6666 - 6683
  • [37] Development of a dose verification system for Vero4DRT using Monte Carlo method
    Ishihara, Yoshitomo
    Sawada, Akira
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Miyabe, Yuki
    Tanabe, Hiroaki
    Kaneko, Shuji
    Takayama, Kenji
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Kokubo, Masaki
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06): : 160 - 172
  • [38] Validation of the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm versus Monte Carlo for clinical treatment plans
    Hoffmann, Lone
    Alber, Markus
    Soehn, Matthias
    Elstrom, Ulrik Vindelev
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (08) : 3909 - 3915
  • [39] Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Lorentini, S.
    Widesott, L.
    Schwarz, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (21) : 8601 - 8619
  • [40] Out-of-Field Dose Calculation by a Commercial Treatment Planning System and Comparison by Monte Carlo Simulation for Varian TrueBeam®
    Shine, N. S.
    Paramu, Raghukumar
    Gopinath, M.
    Bos, R. C. Jaon
    Jayadevan, P. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 44 (03) : 156 - 175