The advantages and limitations of seeking sex online: A comparison of reasons given for online and offline sexual liaisons by men who have sex with men

被引:47
作者
Ross, Michael W.
Rosser, B. R. Simon
McCurdy, Sheryl
Feldman, Jamie
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Promot & Prevent Res, Houston, TX 77225 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15598519jsr4401_7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Internet has developed as a major site for sexual activity, both cybersex and for making contacts for sex in real life (IRL). As part of a major study of HIV-risk behavior on the Internet and IRL, we obtained online responses from 1, 017 Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. Open-ended questions solicited responses regarding whether respondents preferred to meet sexual partners first IRL (48.4%), on the Internet (31.6%), or "it depends" (20%), and "why? ". Data were analyzed by theme, with themes grouped into overarching domains. Data indicate that for those preferring the Internet, themes represented were ease of Internet use, its advantages for people who were shy, and its anonymity, safety, the excitement and opportunity for experimentation of Internet contact, ability to avoid interpersonal contact, and control of visuals and the environment. Reasons for preferring meeting IRL included some of the same themes but with an emphasis on the importance of a "real presence " and the possibility to build a relationship. Where "it depends," key themes were contextual: mood, time, setting, alcohol and drug use, sexual needs and urgency, and relationship intentions. Antagonistic advantages were often noted for cybersex and IRL. These data suggest that motivations for making Internet sexual contact in MSM are complex, depend on the context and nature of the relationship sought, and that the Internet has allowed the development of a class of sexual contacts located between IRL and fantasy.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 71
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Cooper A, 2002, Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians, P1
[2]  
DAVID E, 1996, GAY MEXICO INSIDERS
[3]  
DAVIDOVICH U, 2005, AIDS IMP C CAP TOWN
[4]  
DAVIS M, 2004, AIDS CARE, V16, P1
[5]  
MANN C, 2002, HDB INTERVIEW RES CO
[6]   Demarginalizing the sexual self [J].
McKenna, KYA ;
Green, AS ;
Smith, PK .
JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (04) :302-311
[7]  
Ross M. W., 2002, SEX INTERNET GUIDEBO, P47, DOI DOI 10.1080/09540120310001634047
[8]   Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men:: implications for research and HIV interventions [J].
Ross, MW ;
Tikkanen, R ;
Månsson, SA .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (05) :749-758
[9]   Typing, doing, and being: Sexuality and the Internet [J].
Ross, MW .
JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (04) :342-352
[10]   Beliefs about cybersex and Internet-mediated sex of Latino men who have Internet sex with men: relationships with sexual practices in cybersex and in real life [J].
Ross, MW ;
Rosser, BRS ;
Stanton, J .
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2004, 16 (08) :1002-1011