A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews

被引:84
|
作者
Quan Nha Hong [1 ]
Pluye, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
critical appraisal; mixed methods research; quality assessment; systematic mixed studies review; systematic review; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; DEFINITION; INTEGRATION; CHECKLIST; SPECTRUM; INSIGHTS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/1558689818770058
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The past decade has been rich with methodological advancements in systematic reviews, several of which were inspired by the literature on mixed methods research. Systematic mixed studies reviews-that is, reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence-are increasingly popular as they can provide a better understanding of complex phenomena and interventions. However, they raise new challenges, especially regarding how to perform critical appraisal of the included studies that vary regarding the methodologies used. To address this challenge, conceptually clarifying critical appraisal is necessary. To this end, this article provides a framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. This framework is an essential first step toward providing clear guidance on how to perform critical appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 460
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK OF MONITORING MUTAGENS CARCINOGENS - A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL
    BENIGNI, R
    GIULIANI, A
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1987, 125 (04) : 465 - 473
  • [32] Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC)
    Duval, Daphne
    Pearce-Smith, Nicola
    Palmer, Jennifer C. C.
    Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi
    Rudd, Paul
    Clark, Rachel
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [33] Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
    Munn, Zachary
    Stone, Jennifer C.
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Sears, Kim
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    Barker, Timothy Hugh
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 467 - 471
  • [34] Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC)
    Daphne Duval
    Nicola Pearce-Smith
    Jennifer C. Palmer
    Jason Kwasi Sarfo-Annin
    Paul Rudd
    Rachel Clark
    Systematic Reviews, 12
  • [35] CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS ASSESSING SAFETY OUTCOMES OF SSRIS IN THE PERINATAL PERIOD
    Merlo, G. B.
    Elliot, L.
    Campbell, S.
    Norris, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A539 - A539
  • [36] Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss
    Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Jr.
    Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 40 (05) : 542 - 552
  • [37] The management strategies of cancer-associated anorexia: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Zhang Fangyuan
    Shen Aomei
    Jin Yinghui
    Qiang Wanmin
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 18
  • [38] Fast-and-frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Lorenz, Robert C.
    Jenny, Mirjam
    Jacobs, Anja
    Matthias, Katja
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (06) : 1049 - 1059
  • [39] Practical Approach to Heterogeneity in Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
    Pineda-Alvarez, Mateo
    Pablo Zapata-Ospina, Juan
    UNIVERSITAS MEDICA, 2022, 63 (01):
  • [40] State of the evidence on acute asthma management in children: A critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Boluyt, Nicole
    Van der Lee, Johanna H.
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    Brand, Paul L. P.
    Offringa, Martin
    PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (06) : 1334 - 1343