A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews

被引:84
|
作者
Quan Nha Hong [1 ]
Pluye, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
critical appraisal; mixed methods research; quality assessment; systematic mixed studies review; systematic review; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; DEFINITION; INTEGRATION; CHECKLIST; SPECTRUM; INSIGHTS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/1558689818770058
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The past decade has been rich with methodological advancements in systematic reviews, several of which were inspired by the literature on mixed methods research. Systematic mixed studies reviews-that is, reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence-are increasingly popular as they can provide a better understanding of complex phenomena and interventions. However, they raise new challenges, especially regarding how to perform critical appraisal of the included studies that vary regarding the methodologies used. To address this challenge, conceptually clarifying critical appraisal is necessary. To this end, this article provides a framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. This framework is an essential first step toward providing clear guidance on how to perform critical appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 460
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A critical appraisal tool for systematic literature reviews in software engineering
    bin Ali, Nauman
    Usman, Muhammad
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 112 : 48 - 50
  • [22] Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of executive function treatments in TBI
    Raymer, Anastasia M.
    Roitsch, Jane
    Redman, Rachael
    Michalek, Anne M. P.
    Johnson, Rachel K.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2018, 32 (13-14) : 1601 - 1611
  • [23] Exploratory study of residents' conceptual framework for critical appraisal of the literature
    Williams, BC
    Stern, DT
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1997, 9 (04) : 270 - 275
  • [24] A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROCESS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ZIRCONIA SINGLE CROWNS
    Lang, Lisa A.
    Teich, Sorin T.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (06): : 476 - 484
  • [25] A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management
    Hallinger, Philip
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 51 (02) : 126 - +
  • [26] The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework
    Hamideh Moosapour
    Farzane Saeidifard
    Maryam Aalaa
    Akbar Soltani
    Bagher Larijani
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 2021, 20 : 919 - 929
  • [27] The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework
    Moosapour, Hamideh
    Saeidifard, Farzane
    Aalaa, Maryam
    Soltani, Akbar
    Larijani, Bagher
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2021, 20 (01) : 919 - 929
  • [28] Thinking of conceptual reviews and systematic reviews
    Ayala, Ricardo A.
    NURSING INQUIRY, 2018, 25 (04)
  • [29] Improving the quality of myofascial release research - A critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Ajimsha, M. S.
    Shenoy, Pramod D.
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (03) : 561 - 567
  • [30] Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality
    Brackett, Alexandria
    Batten, Janene
    HEART & LUNG, 2022, 53 : 32 - 35