A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews

被引:90
作者
Quan Nha Hong [1 ]
Pluye, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
critical appraisal; mixed methods research; quality assessment; systematic mixed studies review; systematic review; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; DEFINITION; INTEGRATION; CHECKLIST; SPECTRUM; INSIGHTS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/1558689818770058
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The past decade has been rich with methodological advancements in systematic reviews, several of which were inspired by the literature on mixed methods research. Systematic mixed studies reviews-that is, reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence-are increasingly popular as they can provide a better understanding of complex phenomena and interventions. However, they raise new challenges, especially regarding how to perform critical appraisal of the included studies that vary regarding the methodologies used. To address this challenge, conceptually clarifying critical appraisal is necessary. To this end, this article provides a framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. This framework is an essential first step toward providing clear guidance on how to perform critical appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 460
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods [J].
Anderson, Laurie M. ;
Oliver, Sandy R. ;
Michie, Susan ;
Rehfuess, Eva ;
Noyes, Jane ;
Shemilt, Ian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) :1223-1229
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 10 QUEST HELP YOU MA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PROPOSAL MIXED METHO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, BMJ BRIT MED J
[5]   Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT [J].
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Moore, Laurence ;
Riggs, Elisha ;
Cuervo, Luis Gabriel ;
Lumbiganon, Pisake ;
Hawe, Penelope .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 30 (01) :103-109
[6]  
Bai ASV., 2012, Quality Assessment Tools Project Report
[7]   Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review [J].
Barnett-Page, Elaine ;
Thomas, James .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
[8]   What do we know about the non-work determinants of workers' mental health? A systematic review of longitudinal studies [J].
Beauregard, Nancy ;
Marchand, Alain ;
Blanc, Marie-Eve .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[9]  
Booth A., 2016, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, V2nd ed.
[10]   The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research [J].
Bunn, Frances ;
Trivedi, Daksha ;
Alderson, Phil ;
Hamilton, Laura ;
Martin, Alice ;
Pinkney, Emma ;
Iliffe, Steve .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (28) :1-+