A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews

被引:84
|
作者
Quan Nha Hong [1 ]
Pluye, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
critical appraisal; mixed methods research; quality assessment; systematic mixed studies review; systematic review; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; DEFINITION; INTEGRATION; CHECKLIST; SPECTRUM; INSIGHTS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/1558689818770058
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The past decade has been rich with methodological advancements in systematic reviews, several of which were inspired by the literature on mixed methods research. Systematic mixed studies reviews-that is, reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence-are increasingly popular as they can provide a better understanding of complex phenomena and interventions. However, they raise new challenges, especially regarding how to perform critical appraisal of the included studies that vary regarding the methodologies used. To address this challenge, conceptually clarifying critical appraisal is necessary. To this end, this article provides a framework for critical appraisal in systematic mixed studies reviews. This framework is an essential first step toward providing clear guidance on how to perform critical appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 460
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Shannon, S
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2002, 53 (04): : 195 - 197
  • [2] CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Ata, Baris
    Urman, Bulent
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 5 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [3] Inadequate critical appraisal of studies in systematic reviews of time to diagnosis
    Launay, Elise
    Cohen, Jeremie F.
    Morfouace, Michele
    Gras-Le Guen, Christele
    Ravaud, Philippe
    Chalumeau, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 78 : 43 - 51
  • [4] Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews
    Pluye, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (04) : 722 - 722
  • [5] TIPS AND TRICKS: Critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    O'Mathuna, Donal P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (04) : 414 - 418
  • [6] Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal
    Willhelm, Christiane
    Girisch, Wolfgang
    Gottschling, Sven
    Graeber, Stefan
    Wahl, Holger
    Meyer, Sascha
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2013, 54 (04): : 261 - 266
  • [7] Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool
    Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
    Khanassov, Vladimir
    Hong, Quan Nha
    Bush, Paula L.
    Vedel, Isabelle
    Pluye, Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (01) : 500 - 501
  • [8] Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
    Davide Matino
    Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha
    Alfonso Iorio
    Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 1 (1)
  • [9] Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal
    Chung, Mei
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Ip, Stanley
    Raman, Gowri
    Yu, Winifred W.
    Trikalinos, Thomas A.
    Lichtenstein, Alice H.
    Yetley, Elizabeth A.
    Lau, Joseph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 89 (04): : 1099 - 1113
  • [10] Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Micronutrients and Health: A Critical Appraisal
    Chung, Mei
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23