Bridging the fields of entrepreneurship and education: The role of philosophical perspectives in fostering opportunity identification

被引:16
作者
Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Baggen, Yvette [1 ]
Biemans, Harm [1 ]
Noroozi, Omid [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Educ & Learning Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Entrepreneurship education; Opportunity identification; Opportunity discovery; Opportunity creation; Philosophical perspective; Learning theory; Teaching approach; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; PRIOR-KNOWLEDGE; DISCOVERY; STUDENTS; DESIGN; EFFECTUATION; SEARCH; RECOGNITION; ENTERPRISE; CAUSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100632
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The number of entrepreneurship education (EE) programs that aim to foster opportunity identification (OI) as a key entrepreneurial capability has grown considerably in the past few decades. However, these EE programs mostly lack a robust theoretical framework that could help educators and researchers select teaching approaches in line with their philosophical perspectives. This study proposes a theory-driven framework for fostering OI by bridging entrepreneurship and education fields, considering the ontological and epistemological assumptions that exist in both fields. The proposed framework includes different philosophical perspectives on entrepreneurial opportunities and strategies for identifying opportunities coupled with the most relevant learning theories and teaching approaches for fostering OI. Based on this framework, behaviorism and cognitivism are the most consistent learning theories with the opportunity discovery perspective's philosophical assumptions, and social constructivist learning theory is more appropriate for developing EE programs based on the opportunity creation perspective. This framework suggests that for developing an efficacious EE program to improve individuals' OI performance, different perspectives on the emergence of opportunities and learning should be combined and integrated into a consistent, constructively aligned EE program. The paper concludes with implications for the theory and practice in the entrepreneurship education field.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]   Exploring social constructivism: theories and practicalities [J].
Adams, Paul .
EDUCATION 3-13, 2006, 34 (03) :243-257
[2]  
Allen J.A., 1994, J TEACH SOC WORK, V8, P31
[3]   Entrepreneurship and Epistemology: The Philosophical Underpinnings of the Study of Entrepreneurial Opportunities [J].
Alvarez, Sharon A. ;
Barney, Jay B. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2010, 4 :557-583
[4]   DISCOVERY AND CREATION: ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION [J].
Alvarez, Sharon A. ;
Barney, Jay B. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (1-2) :11-26
[5]  
Amineh R. J., 2015, Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, V1, P9
[6]   Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy [J].
Anderson, Terry ;
Dron, Jon .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2011, 12 (03) :80-97
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Scandinavian Journal of Management, DOI [101016/jscaman200509009, DOI 10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2005.09.009]
[8]  
[Anonymous], BABS KAUFFM ENTR RES
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, Especially Within NonBusiness Studies
[10]   A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development [J].
Ardichvili, A ;
Cardozo, R ;
Ray, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2003, 18 (01) :105-123