Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Systems Photogrammetry and Structure from Motion in Surveying and Mapping: A Review

被引:48
作者
Deliry, Sayed Ishaq [1 ]
Avdan, Ugur [2 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Remote Sensing & Geog Informat Syst, TR-26555 Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir Tech Univ, Earth & Space Sci Inst, TR-26555 Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
Accuracy assessment; Literature review; Structure from motion (SfM); Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) photogrammetry; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); GROUND CONTROL POINTS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; LOW-COST UAV; HIGH-RESOLUTION; VEHICLE UAV; TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS; SOFTWARE PACKAGES; AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS; SURFACE MODELS; SNOW DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s12524-021-01366-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Highly detailed topographic surveying at minimal cost and effort has always been one of the developing areas of scientific interest. Image-based remote sensing solutions using unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and structure from motion (SfM) with multi-view stereo (MVS) photogrammetry are the latest automation and advancement in surveying engineering that provides high-resolution topographic data. Although recent developments have led to the extensive use of UAS-SfM in mapping applications, the only concern that remains is the UAS-based survey accuracy; is this method accurate enough to be used in surveying and mapping applications as an alternative to conventional methods? Evaluation of accuracy and validation of products before they can be applied to a real-world problem is a prerequisite for any emerging technology. Recently, there has been a proliferation of accuracy assessment and validation studies of UAS-SfM-based surveying. However, quantitative validation studies are slightly different, and the accuracy of each study is significantly different from another. The true limits of this technique can only be revealed by assembling a large dataset from previous individual studies. This study was motivated by the lack of such quantitative analysis. This study gives an overview of UAS and SfM, discusses the major factors that influence the accuracy, and presents a synthesis of the recent validation studies conducted quantitative assessments of UAS-SfM-derived digital elevation datasets, and thereby demonstrates the accuracy and limitation of UAS-SfM -based topographic surveying.
引用
收藏
页码:1997 / 2017
页数:21
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows
    Aasen, Helge
    Honkavaara, Eija
    Lucieer, Arko
    Zarco-Tejada, Pablo J.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [2] Abu Sari MY, 2018, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V9, P160
  • [3] UAS-Based Archaeological Remote Sensing: Review, Meta-Analysis and State-of-the-Art
    Adamopoulos, Efstathios
    Rinaudo, Fulvio
    [J]. DRONES, 2020, 4 (03) : 1 - 28
  • [4] Agisoft L. L. C., 2018, PHOTOSCAN USER MANUA
  • [5] Reconstruction of extreme topography from UAV structure from motion photogrammetry
    Agueera-Vega, Francisco
    Carvajal-Ramirez, Fernando
    Martinez-Carricondo, Patricio
    Sanchez-Hermosilla Lopez, Julian
    Javier Mesas-Carrascosa, Francisco
    Garcia-Ferrer, Alfonso
    Juan Perez-Porras, Fernando
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2018, 121 : 127 - 138
  • [6] Accuracy of Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry
    Aguera-Vega, Francisco
    Carvajal-Ramirez, Fernando
    Martinez-Carricondo, Patricio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (02)
  • [7] Generation of accurate digital elevation models from UAV acquired low percentage overlapping images
    Ajayi, Oluibukun Gbenga
    Salubi, Akporode Anthony
    Angbas, Alu Fredrick
    Odigure, Mukwedeh Godfrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (8-10) : 3113 - 3134
  • [8] COMPARISON OF UAS-BASED PHOTOGRAMMETRY SOFTWARE FOR 3D POINT CLOUD GENERATION: A SURVEY OVER A HISTORICAL SITE
    Alidoost, F.
    Arefi, H.
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL GEOADVANCES WORKSHOP - GEOADVANCES 2017: ISPRS WORKSHOP ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL & MULTI-SCALE SPATIAL DATA MODELING, 2017, 4-4 (W4): : 55 - 61
  • [9] American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 1990, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, V56, P1068
  • [10] American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), 2014, ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data