Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk reduction: a retrospective observational analysis

被引:10
作者
Vathanan, Veluppillai [1 ,2 ]
Ashokkumar, Oliparambil [2 ]
McAree, Trixie [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] North West London Hosp NHS Trust, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
Episiotomy; instrumental delivery; obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineal trauma; PERINEAL LACERATIONS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; REPAIR; TEARS; 3RD-DEGREE; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2013-0269
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the risks of sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) during childbirth. Methods: Data were analysed from 12,612 vaginal deliveries recorded at Northwick Park District General Hospital, London, from 1 January 2006 to 30 November 2009. Results: A total of 85.6% were spontaneous deliveries and 14.2% were instrument deliveries. The majority (64.5%) sustained some form of perineal damage, 3.7% being OASI. Logistic regression analyses revealed the risk factors for OASI to be Asian ethnicity [odds ratio (OR) 4.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.998-7.679], a maternal age of >40 years (OR 2.722, 95% CI 1.315-5.636), higher foetal birth weight (>4500 g; OR 6.228, 95% CI 2.695-14.392), lower parity (para 0; OR 16.803, 95% CI 7.697-36.685), and instrumental delivery. Forceps delivery posed the greatest risk (OR 8.4, 95% CI 5.822-12.151). Not having an episiotomy increased the risk of OASI by five times compared with having one. Conclusions: Risk factors for OASI include maternal age >40 years, higher foetal birth weight, lower parity, instrumental delivery, and Asian ethnicity. Mediolateral episiotomy appears to reduce the risk of OASI. Specific variables have been identified for incorporation into a risk-reduction strategy that could be introduced antenatally to evaluate and assess OASI risk.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 767
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, MAN 3 4 DEGR PER TEA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, OP VAG DEL GREEN TOP
  • [3] PErineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): protocol for a matched pair cluster trial
    Bick, Debra E.
    Kettle, Christine
    Macdonald, Sue
    Thomas, Peter W.
    Hills, Robert K.
    Ismail, Khaled M. K.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2010, 10
  • [4] Episiotomy for vaginal birth
    Carroli, Guillermo
    Mignini, Luciano
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [5] Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery
    Christianson, LM
    Bovbjerg, VE
    McDavitt, EC
    Hullfish, KL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (01) : 255 - 260
  • [6] Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery
    de Leeuw, JW
    Struijk, PC
    Vierhout, ME
    Wallenburg, HCS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04): : 383 - 387
  • [7] Obstetric anal sphincter injury - Incidence, risk factors, and management
    Dudding, Thomas C.
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    Kamm, Michael A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (02) : 224 - 237
  • [8] A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
    Dudley, NJ
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (01) : 80 - 89
  • [9] Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review & national practice survey
    Fernando, RJ
    Sultan, AH
    Radley, S
    Jones, PW
    Johanson, RB
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 2 (1)
  • [10] Fernando RJ, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V19, P1