Lakatos's criticism of Carnapian inductive logic was mistaken

被引:4
作者
Groves, Teddy
机构
关键词
Inductive logic; Carnap; Lakatos; History of philosophy; Philosophy of science; PROBABILITY; PHILOSOPHY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.014
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In [39], Imre Lakatos influentially argued that Carnapian inductive logic was a degenerate research programme. This paper argues that Lakatos's criticism was mistaken and that, according to Lakatos's own standards, Carnapian inductive logic was progressive rather than degenerate. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 21
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adamcík M, 2014, KYBERNETIKA, V50, P175
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, PSA P BIENN M PHIL S, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, LIB LIVING PHILOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1962, LOGICAL FDN PROBABIL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Two Essays on Entropy
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS, DOI DOI 10.1093/019925656X.001.0001
[7]  
[Anonymous], PROBLEM INDUCTIVE LO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO
[9]  
Bar-Hillel Yehoshua, 1953, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V4, P147, DOI DOI 10.1093/BJPS/IV.14.147
[10]   FERGUSON DISTRIBUTIONS VIA POLYA URN SCHEMES [J].
BLACKWELL, D ;
MACQUEEN, JB .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1973, 1 (02) :353-355