Carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination: a review of greenhouse gas emissions and estimation tools

被引:91
作者
Cornejo, Pablo K. [1 ]
Santana, Mark V. E. [1 ]
Hokanson, David R. [2 ]
Mihelcic, James R. [1 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Trussell Technol Inc, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION | 2014年 / 4卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
carbon footprint models; climate change; life cycle assessment; reverse osmosis; sustainability; water reclamation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; REVERSE-OSMOSIS DESALINATION; WASTE-WATER; RESOURCE RECOVERY; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS; ALTERNATIVES; SANITATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.2166/wrd.2014.058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As population and water demand increase, there is a growing need for alternative water supplies from water reuse and desalination systems. These systems are beneficial to water augmentation; however, there are concerns related to their carbon footprint. This study compiles the reported carbon footprint of these systems from existing literature, recognizes general trends of carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination, and identifies challenges associated with comparing the carbon footprint. Furthermore, limitations, challenges, knowledge gaps, and recommendations associated with carbon footprint estimation tools are presented. Reverse osmosis (RO) technologies were found to have lower CO2 emissions than thermal desalination technologies and the estimated carbon footprint of seawater RO desalination (0.4-6.7 kg CO(2)eq/m(3)) is generally larger than brackish water RO desalination (0.4-2.5 kg CO(2)eq/m(3)) and water reuse systems (0.1-2.4 kg CO(2)eq/m(3)). The large range of reported values is due to variability in location, technologies, life cycle stages, parameters considered, and estimation tools, which were identified as major challenges to making accurate comparisons. Carbon footprint estimation tools could be improved by separating emissions by unit process, direct and indirect emissions, and considering the offset potential of various resource recovery strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 252
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, DOI DOI 10.3403/30151316.
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD ENV WAT RES C
[3]  
Beery M, 2010, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V28, P1069
[4]  
Biswas W.K., 2009, Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, V56, P369
[5]  
Carlson S. W., 2007, ENERGY INDEX DEV BEN
[6]   Quantifying benefits of resource recovery from sanitation provision in a developing world setting [J].
Cornejo, Pablo K. ;
Zhang, Qiong ;
Mihelcic, James R. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 131 :7-15
[7]   Comparison of different modeling approaches to better evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from whole wastewater treatment plants [J].
Corominas, Lluis ;
Flores-Alsina, Xavier ;
Snip, Laura ;
Vanrolleghem, Peter A. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2012, 109 (11) :2854-2863
[8]  
Crawford G., 2011, CHEApet Users Manual
[9]  
de Haas D., 2011, Water, V38, P57
[10]  
Eggleston H. S., 2006, NATL GREENH GA UNPUB