Seismic Design Considerations for Architectural Design Aspects

被引:0
作者
Korkmaz, Serra Zerrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Konya Tech Univ, Dept Architecture, Fac Architecture & Design, Konya, Turkey
来源
ICONARP INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING | 2019年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Earthquake; irregularity; architectural design; earthquake code; torsion; RECENT EARTHQUAKES; BUILDINGS; DAMAGE; PERFORMANCE; FAILURE; TURKEY;
D O I
10.15320/ICONARP.2019.98
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Architectural design decisions play an important role in the earthquake behavior of buildings. However, architects are very unfamiliar with earthquake response concept. Earthquake resistant design (ERD) initiates generally during the architectural design stage to adhere to these principles. This study was focused on plan geometries, architectural design and structural system configurations for structural earthquake responses. A general-purpose finite element program was used to evaluate several irregularities and their corresponding earthquake responses. In the first phase of the study, the projections in plan view and projection ratios were compared from a torsional response perspective. In the second phase, nonparallel axes are investigated. In the last phase, the effects of shear wall arrangement on torsional irregularity response were analysed by considering 4 different configurations in a school building failure during the recent earthquake (2011) in the city, Van located in the east of Turkey. The number of storys was chosen as a parameter for the latter phase. The mode superposition method was preferred for the linear dynamic analyses. According to the results of the study, the torsional rotation was found to be proportional to the projection ratio in plan. For non-orthogonal cases, structure with an inclined axis more than 30 degrees, torsional irregularity factor exceeded the code-defined limit. Beneficial observations and conclusions were drawn for both architects and structural engineers' perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 591
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS: WHERE TO NEXT?
    Dhakal, Rajesh P.
    BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 57 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [42] Architectural layout design optimization
    Michalek, JJ
    Choudhary, R
    Papalambros, PY
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 34 (05) : 461 - 484
  • [43] Thinking with diagrams in architectural design
    Do, EYL
    Gross, MD
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2001, 15 (01) : 135 - 149
  • [44] Architectural Design of Green Campus
    Liu, Qixia
    Zou, Xin
    Deng, Junyan
    PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 610-613 : 2883 - 2888
  • [45] Fusion of Perceptions in Architectural Design
    Ciftcioglu, Ozer
    Bittermann, Michael S.
    ECAADE 2013: COMPUTATION AND PERFORMANCE, VOL 2, 2013, : 335 - 344
  • [46] Thinking with Diagrams in Architectural Design
    Ellen Yi-Luen Do
    Mark D. Gross
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2001, 15 : 135 - 149
  • [47] Seismic Design of Piles in Liquefiable Soils
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Sarkar, R.
    Huang, Y.
    NEW FRONTIERS IN ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, : 31 - 44
  • [48] Wind design considerations for base-isolated post-disaster steel buildings in moderate seismic regions
    Athanasiou, Anastasia
    Tirca, Lucia
    Stathopoulos, Ted
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2025, 226
  • [49] Integrating building shape optimization into the architectural design process
    Yeretzian, Aram
    Partamian, Hmayag
    Dabaghi, Mayssa
    Jabr, Rabih
    ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2020, 63 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [50] Integrated daylighting simulation into the architectural design process for museums
    Kim, Chang-Sung
    Seo, Kyung-Wook
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2012, 5 (04) : 325 - 336