A Cascading Bias Correction Method for Global Climate Model Simulated Multiyear Precipitation Variability

被引:1
|
作者
Frei, Allan [1 ,2 ]
Mukundan, Rajith [3 ]
Chen, Jie [4 ]
Gelda, Rakesh K. [3 ]
Owens, Emmet M. [3 ]
Gass, Jordan [3 ]
Ravindranath, Arun [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ New York, Hunter Coll, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] City Univ New York, Inst Sustainable Cities, Hunter Coll, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] New York City Dept Environm Protect, Water Qual Modeling Sect, New York City, Kingston, Jamaica
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Sc, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Climate variability; Model evaluation; performance; Multidecadal variability; EXTREME HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS; SOURCE AREA HYDROLOGY; NEW-YORK; CHANGE IMPACT; DROUGHT; STREAMFLOW; TEMPERATURE; FREQUENCY; RUNOFF; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-21-0148.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The use of global climate model (GCM) precipitation simulations typically requires corrections for precipitation biases at subgrid spatial scales, typically at daily or monthly time scales. However, over many regions GCMs underestimate the magnitudes of multiyear precipitation extremes in the observed climate, resulting in a likely underestimation of the magnitudes of multiyear precipitation extremes in future scenarios. The objective of this study is to propose a method to extract from GCMs more realistic scenarios of multiyear precipitation extremes over time horizons of decades to one century. This proposed correction method is analogous to widely used bias correction methods, except that it is applied to variability at longer time scales than previous implementations (i.e., multiyear rather than daily or monthly). A case study of precipitation over a basin from the New York City water supply system demonstrates the potential magnitude of the underestimation of multiyear precipitation using uncorrected GCM scenarios, and the potential impact of the correction on multiyear hydrological extremes. Overall, it is a practical, conceptually simple approach meant for water supply system impact studies, but can be used for any impact studies that require more realistic multiyear extreme precipitation extreme scenarios. Significance StatementThe purpose of this study is to present a practical method to address a particular difficulty that in some regions arises in climate change impact studies: global climate models tend to underestimate the multiyear variability of precipitation over some regions, resulting in an underestimation of the magnitudes and/or intensities of prolonged droughts as well as prolonged wet periods. The method is analogous to widely used bias correction methods, except it is applied to variability at longer time scales than previous implementations (i.e., multiyear rather than daily or monthly). It is designed to provide more realistic estimates of extreme hydrological scenarios during the twenty-first century. Our particular interest is for managers of water supply systems, but the method may be of interest to others for whom multiyear precipitation extremes are critical.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 713
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Piecewise-quantile mapping improves bias correction of global climate model daily precipitation towards preserving quantiles and extremes
    Zhang, Qin
    Gan, Yaoyao
    Zhang, Liping
    She, Dunxian
    Wang, Gangsheng
    Wang, Shuxia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (15) : 7968 - 7986
  • [2] Can the variability in precipitation simulations across GCMs be reduced through sensible bias correction?
    Nguyen, Ha
    Mehrotra, Rajeshwar
    Sharma, Ashish
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2017, 49 (9-10) : 3257 - 3275
  • [3] Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?
    Ehret, U.
    Zehe, E.
    Wulfmeyer, V.
    Warrach-Sagi, K.
    Liebert, J.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (09) : 3391 - 3404
  • [4] On the evaluation of climate model simulated precipitation extremes
    Toreti, Andrea
    Naveau, Philippe
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (01):
  • [5] A new region-aware bias-correction method for simulated precipitation in areas of complex orography
    Jose Gomez-Navarro, Juan
    Raible, Christoph C.
    Bozhinova, Denica
    Martius, Olivia
    Garcia Valero, Juan Andres
    Pedro Montavez, Juan
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (06) : 2231 - 2247
  • [6] Climate model bias correction for nonstationary conditions
    Madani, Mohammad
    Chilkoti, Vinod
    Bolisetti, Tirupati
    Seth, Rajesh
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 47 (03) : 326 - 336
  • [7] Impact of Reference Dataset Selection on RCM Evaluation, Bias Correction, and Resulting Climate Change Signals of Precipitation
    Gampe, David
    Schmid, Josef
    Ludwig, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2019, 20 (09) : 1813 - 1828
  • [8] A downscaling and bias correction method for climate model ensemble simulations of local-scale hourly precipitation
    Yoshikane, Takao
    Yoshimura, Kei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Influence of Bias Correction Methods on Simulated Koppen-Geiger Climate Zones in Europe
    Szabo-Takacs, Beata
    Farda, Ales
    Skalak, Petr
    Meitner, Jan
    CLIMATE, 2019, 7 (02)
  • [10] Hydrological Modeling to Evaluate Climate Model Simulations and Their Bias Correction
    Hakala, Kirsti
    Addor, Nans
    Seibert, Jan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 19 (08) : 1321 - 1337