Impact of computed tomography on patient's care in nontraumatic acute abdomen: 90 patients

被引:8
作者
Foinant, M.
Lipiecka, E.
Buc, E.
Boire, J. Y.
Schmidt, J.
Garcier, J. M.
Pezet, D.
Boyer, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Hop G Montpied, Serv Radiol B, F-6003 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Hotel Dieu, Serv Chirurg Digest, F-6003 Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] CHU Clermont Ferrand, Hop G Montpied, Serv Accueil Urgences, F-6003 Clermont Ferrand, France
来源
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE | 2007年 / 88卷 / 04期
关键词
computed tomography; nontraumatic actute abdomen; cost-effectivenss;
D O I
10.1016/S0221-0363(07)89855-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine the contribution of computerized tomography (CT) to the management of nontraumatic acute abdomen, to evaluate interobserver agreement and the contribution of CT to cost control, to look for the predictive factors of CT. Patients and method. Ninety prospectively included patients, admitted for nontraumatic acute abdomen and examined by a surgeon, received CT examination. Diagnosis and treatment 1) envisioned before and 2) defined after CT, and 3) finally retained were compared, and the interobserver agreement was calculated after the second reading. The predictive value of the clinical and biological criteria as well as the radiological criteria characterizing these patients was sought. Results. CT was contributive in 68.9% of cases, with a reliable diagnosis and treatment strategy, defined after CT examination, for 92.2% and 90%, respectively. Inter observer agreement was 93.3%. CT contributed to reducing costs in 15.5% of patients, for an additional cost estimated at 104-139 euros. The positive predictive factors of the CT contribution were age over 70 years, localized symptoms, fever, and high CRP. Conclusion. In agreement with the literature, in our study CT appears to be a choice examination to guide patient care in nontraumatic acute abdomen.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 566
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: Abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation
    Ahn, SH
    Mayo-Smith, WW
    Murphy, BL
    Reinert, SE
    Cronan, JJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [2] Brown David F M, 2002, Eur J Emerg Med, V9, P330
  • [3] *CEDIT AP HP COM E, 1997, SCANN ENTR GAMM, P97
  • [4] Therapeutic impact of abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal symptoms
    Chambers, A
    Halligan, S
    Goh, V
    Dhillon, S
    Hassan, A
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (03) : 248 - 253
  • [5] ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE ACUTE ABDOMEN
    DAVIES, AH
    MASTORAKOU, I
    COBB, R
    ROGERS, C
    LINDSELL, D
    MORTENSEN, NJM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (10) : 1178 - 1180
  • [6] Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain
    Esses, D
    Birnbaum, A
    Bijur, P
    Shah, S
    Gleyzer, A
    Gallagher, EJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 22 (04) : 270 - 272
  • [7] Guillemin F, 2000, PRESSE MED, V29, P829
  • [8] A PILOT EVALUATION OF RADIOGRAPHY OF THE ACUTE ABDOMEN
    HAYWARD, MWJ
    HAYWARD, C
    ENNIS, WP
    ROBERTS, CJ
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1984, 35 (04) : 289 - 291
  • [9] Non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in paediatric practice
    Lambot, K
    Lougue-Sorgho, LC
    Gorincour, G
    Chapuy, S
    Chaumoitre, K
    Bourlière-Najean, B
    Panuel, M
    Devred, P
    Petit, P
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2005, 86 (02): : 223 - 233
  • [10] Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: Unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series
    MacKersie, AB
    Lane, MJ
    Gerhardt, RT
    Claypool, HA
    Keenan, S
    Katz, DS
    Tucker, JE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) : 114 - 122