Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization

被引:113
作者
Chandra, A
Dong, L
Huang, E
Kuban, DA
O'Neill, L
Rosen, I
Pollack, A
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate; localization; ultrasound; radiation; alignment;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04612-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The NOMOS (Sewickley, PA) B-mode Acquisition and Targeting System (BAT) ultrasound system provides a rapid means of correcting for interfraction prostate positional variation. In this investigation, we report our experience on the clinical issues relevant to the daily use of the BAT system and the analysis of combined setup error and organ motion for 3509 BAT alignment procedures in 147 consecutive patients treated with IMRT for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: After setup to external skin marks, therapists performed the BAT ultrasound alignment procedure before each IMRT treatment. In this study, a single physician (A.C.) reviewed all BAT images and classified image quality and accuracy of image alignment by the therapist. On a scale of 1-3, near-perfect image quality or alignment was given a 1, fair image quality or misalignment less than or equal to5 mm (likely within the PTV) was given a 2, and unacceptable image quality or misalignment >5 mm (potential to violate the PTV) was given a value of 3. The distribution of shifts made was analyzed in each dimension and for all patients. The time required to perform the BAT alignment was also assessed in 17 patients. Results: Among the 3509 attempted BAT procedures, the image quality was judged to be poor or unacceptable in 5.1% (181). Of the remaining 3328 BAT images, with quality scores of 1-2, alignments were unacceptable (>5 mm misalignment as judged by the reviewing physician) in 3% (100). The mean shift in each direction, averaged over all patients, was 0.5-0.7 mm. Interfraction standard deviation (1 SD) of prostate position based on combined setup error and internal organ motion is 4.9 mm, 4.4 mm, and 2.8 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and lateral (RL) dimensions, respectively. The distribution of the shifts was a near-random Gaussian-type in all three major axes, with greater variations in AP and SI directions. The percent of BAT procedures in which the shift was > 5 mm was 28.6% in AP, 23 % in SI, and 9% in RL directions. The average BAT procedure took extra 5 min out of a 20-min time slot in a typical eight-field IMRT treatment. Conclusion: The quality of the daily ultrasound images was deemed acceptable in 95%. Major alignment errors by therapists were only 3%. The BAT system is clinically effective and feasible in a matter of 5 min. Although the accuracy of the BAT was not addressed in this investigation, we found a significant percentage of large shifts being made from the initial alignment position. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 447
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate
    Alasti, H
    Petric, MP
    Catton, CN
    Warde, PR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03): : 869 - 884
  • [2] Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy
    Antolak, JA
    Rosen, II
    Childress, CH
    Zagars, GK
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03): : 661 - 672
  • [3] PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS
    CROOK, JM
    RAYMOND, Y
    SALHANI, D
    YANG, H
    ESCHE, B
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [4] Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy
    Dawson, LA
    Mah, K
    Franssen, E
    Morton, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (05): : 1155 - 1161
  • [5] Conformal external beam treatment of prostate cancer
    Hanks, GE
    Hanlon, AL
    Schultheiss, TE
    Freedman, GM
    Hunt, M
    Pinover, WH
    Movsas, B
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [6] Optimization of conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer: Report of a dose escalation study
    Hanks, GE
    Schultheiss, TE
    Hanlon, AL
    Hunt, M
    Lee, WR
    Epstein, BE
    Coia, LR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03): : 543 - 550
  • [7] Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: Five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions
    Hanks, GE
    Hanlon, AL
    Schultheiss, TE
    Pinover, WH
    Movsas, B
    Epstein, BE
    Hunt, MA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (03): : 501 - 510
  • [8] Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate
    Hanley, J
    Lumley, MA
    Mageras, GS
    Sun, J
    Zelefsky, MJ
    Leibel, SA
    Fuks, Z
    Kutcher, GJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02): : 435 - 444
  • [9] Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer
    Huang, E
    Dong, L
    Chandra, A
    Kuban, DA
    Rosen, II
    Evans, A
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (02): : 261 - 268
  • [10] Organ motion and its management
    Langen, KM
    Jones, DTL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (01): : 265 - 278