Structuring Data for Intelligent Predictive Maintenance in Asset Management

被引:16
作者
Aremu, Oluseun Omotola [1 ]
Palau, Adria Salvador [2 ]
Parlikad, Ajith Kumar [2 ]
Hyland-Wood, David [3 ]
McAree, Peter Ross [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2018年 / 51卷 / 11期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Asset management; predictive maintenance; artificial intelligence; information sharing; big data; PROGNOSTICS; TUTORIAL; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.370
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predictive maintenance (PdM) within asset management improves savings in operational cost, productivity, and safety management capabilities. While PdM can be administered using various methods, growing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has lead to current state of the art PdM relying on machine learning (ML) technology. Like other tools used in PdM for asset management, standards for applying ML technology for PdM are required. This work introduces a standard of practice in regards to usage of asset data to develop ML analytic tools for PdM. It provides a standard method for ensuring asset data is in a form conducive to ML algorithms, and ensuring retention of asset information necessary for optimum PdM during the data transform. In the ML domain, it has been proven through research initiatives that the data structure used to train and test ML algorithms has a great impact on their performance and accuracy. Using poorly trained models for estimation due to improper data usage, can leave some AI-based PdM tools vulnerable to high rates of inaccurate estimations. Thus, leading to value loss during an asset's life cycle. (C) 2018, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 519
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system [J].
Alaswad, Suzan ;
Xiang, Yisha .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 157 :54-63
[2]   Prognostics 101: A tutorial for particle filter-based prognostics algorithm using Matlab [J].
An, Dawn ;
Choi, Joo-Ho ;
Kim, Nam Ho .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 115 :161-169
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INTRO STAT LEARNING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, P 4 BERK S MATH STAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Artificial intelligence-a modern approach
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREDATION COMPETITIO
[7]  
Bonissone PP, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4507, P928
[8]   Distributed estimation and detection for sensor networks using hidden Markov random field models [J].
Dogandzic, Aleksandar ;
Zhang, Benhong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2006, 54 (08) :3200-3215
[9]  
Faiz R. B., 2009, Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, V4, P23
[10]   Rolling element bearings diagnostics using the Symbolic Aggregate approXimation [J].
Georgoulas, George ;
Karvelis, Petros ;
Loutas, Theodoros ;
Stylios, Chrysostomos D. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 60-61 :229-242