Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND

被引:7
|
作者
Bhatia, Kriti [1 ]
Loewenkamp, Christian [2 ]
Franz, Volker H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Expt Cognit Sci, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Dept Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2022年 / 22卷 / 12期
关键词
HAPTIC FEEDBACK SUPPORTS; VISUAL INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ILLUSION; DISSOCIATION; STIMULUS; VISION; PREHENSION; CONSTANT; VIOLATE;
D O I
10.1167/jov.22.12.13
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that-when appropriately estimated-JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeysWeber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law
    Heath, Matthew
    Holmes, Scott A.
    Mulla, Ali
    Binsted, Gordon
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [22] Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping
    Ozana, Aviad
    Ganel, Tzvi
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 237 (08) : 2011 - 2021
  • [23] Why and how to apply Weber's Law to coevolution and mimicry
    Dixit, Tanmay
    Caves, Eleanor M.
    Spottiswoode, Claire N.
    Horrocks, Nicholas P. C.
    EVOLUTION, 2021, 75 (08) : 1906 - 1919
  • [24] Speed discrimination in 6-and 10-month-old infants follows Weber's law
    Moehring, Wenke
    Libertus, Melissa E.
    Bertin, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 111 (03) : 405 - 418
  • [25] Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law
    Francisco, E.
    Tannan, V.
    Zhang, Z.
    Holden, J.
    Tommerdahl, M.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 191 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [26] Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber’s Law
    E. Francisco
    V. Tannan
    Z. Zhang
    J. Holden
    M. Tommerdahl
    Experimental Brain Research, 2008, 191
  • [27] Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber’s law in grasping and manual estimation
    Naila Ayala
    Gordon Binsted
    Matthew Heath
    Experimental Brain Research, 2018, 236 : 2439 - 2446
  • [28] Removing binocular cues disrupts the lower visual field advantage for grasping but obeys Weber's law
    Rossit, Stephanie
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 212 - 213
  • [29] Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation
    Ayala, Naila
    Binsted, Gordon
    Heath, Matthew
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (08) : 2439 - 2446
  • [30] Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law
    Gomez-Laplaza, Luis M.
    Gerlai, Robert
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2011, 14 (01) : 1 - 9