Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND

被引:7
|
作者
Bhatia, Kriti [1 ]
Loewenkamp, Christian [2 ]
Franz, Volker H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Expt Cognit Sci, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Dept Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2022年 / 22卷 / 12期
关键词
HAPTIC FEEDBACK SUPPORTS; VISUAL INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ILLUSION; DISSOCIATION; STIMULUS; VISION; PREHENSION; CONSTANT; VIOLATE;
D O I
10.1167/jov.22.12.13
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Weber's law is a fundamental psychophysical principle. It states that the just noticeable difference (JND) between stimuli increases with stimulus magnitude; consequently, larger stimuli should be estimated with larger variability. However, visually guided grasping seems to violate this expectation: When repeatedly grasping large objects, the variability is similar to that when grasping small objects. Based on this result, it was often concluded that grasping violated Weber's law. This astonishing finding generated a flurry of research, with contradictory results and potentially far-reaching implications for theorizing about the functional architecture of the brain. We show that previous studies ignored nonlinearities in the scaling of the grasping response. These nonlinearities result from, for example, the finger span being limited such that the opening of the fingers reaches a ceiling for large objects. We describe how to mathematically take these nonlinearities into account and apply this approach to our own data, as well as to the data of three influential studies on this topic. In all four datasets, we found that-when appropriately estimated-JNDs increase with object size, as expected by Weber's law. We conclude that grasping obeysWeber's law, as do essentially all sensory dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weber's law in grasping
    Ganel, Tzvi
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2015, 15 (08):
  • [2] Grasping Weber's law
    Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
    Brenner, Eli
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (23) : R1089 - R1090
  • [3] Response: When does grasping escape Weber's law?
    Ganel, Tzvi
    Chajut, Eran
    Tanzer, Michal
    Algom, Daniel
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (23) : R1090 - R1091
  • [4] Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law
    Hesse, Constanze
    Harrison, Roisin Elaine
    Giesel, Martin
    Schenk, Thomas
    I-PERCEPTION, 2021, 12 (06):
  • [5] Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law
    Loewenkamp, Christian
    Gaertner, Wiebke
    Haus, Isabel D.
    Franz, Volker H.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 70 : 235 - 245
  • [6] Weber's Law in 2D Grasping
    Ganel, Tzvi
    Ozana, Aviad
    Algom, Daniel
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 : 171 - 171
  • [7] Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law
    Ganel, Tzvi
    Namdar, Gal
    Mirsky, Avigail
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [8] Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber’s law
    Tzvi Ganel
    Gal Namdar
    Avigail Mirsky
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [9] Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber’s law
    Aviad Ozana
    Sigal Berman
    Tzvi Ganel
    Experimental Brain Research, 2018, 236 : 1775 - 1787
  • [10] Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law
    Ozana, Aviad
    Berman, Sigal
    Ganel, Tzvi
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (06) : 1775 - 1787