Steady-state amprenavir and tenofovir pharmacokinetics after coadministration of unboosted or ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers

被引:7
作者
Luber, A. D. [1 ]
Condoluci, D. V. [1 ]
Slowinski, P. D. [1 ]
Andrews, M. [1 ]
Olson, K. [1 ]
Peloquin, C. A. [2 ]
Pappa, K. A. [3 ]
Pakes, G. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Garden State Infect Dis, Voorhees, NJ USA
[2] Natl Jewish Med Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
drug interaction; fosamprenavir; tenofovir; HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS; PROTEASE INHIBITORS; P-GLYCOPROTEIN; ATAZANAVIR-RITONAVIR; EXPERIENCED PATIENTS; DRUG-INTERACTIONS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NAIVE PATIENTS; COMBINATION; EFAVIRENZ;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00765.x
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective An open-label, three-period pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the drug interaction potential between fosamprenavir (FPV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Methods Thirty-six healthy subjects received TDF 300 mg once daily (qd) for 7 days (period 1), and then were randomized to 14 days of either FPV 1400 mg twice daily (bid) or FPV/ritonavir (RTV) 700/100 mg bid alone or with TDF (period 2). Subjects continued their randomized dose of FPV for 14 more days, adding or removing TDF based upon its receipt in period 2 (period 3). Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was carried out on day 7 of period 1 and on day 14 of periods 2 and 3. Steady-state plasma amprenavir (APV) and tenofovir (TFV) pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis and parameter values observed with each regimen were compared using geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals. Results After TDF coadministration, APV geometric mean minimum concentration (C(min)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by 31, 3 and 7% above values observed with unboosted FPV alone; they also increased by 31, 4 and 16% above values observed with FPV/RTV alone. TFV C(min), C(max) and AUC decreased by 12, 25 and 15% after FPV coadministration and by 9, 18 and 7% after FPV/RTV coadministration. No significant changes in RTV pharmacokinetics were observed. No differences were noted in adverse events among dosing periods. Conclusions In this evaluation of the interaction between FPV and TDF, increases in APV exposures and modest decreases in TFV exposures were observed. These were unlikely to be clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Agarwala S, 2005, 3 INT AIDS SOC C HIV
  • [2] SWITCH FROM A ZDV/3TC-BASED REGIMEN TO A COMPLETELY ONCE DAILY (QD) REGIMEN OF EMTRICITABINE/TENOFOVIR DF FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PLUS A THIRD QD AGENT (SONETT)
    Arasteh, K.
    Weitner, L.
    Fenske, S.
    Kuhlmann, B.
    Freiwald, M.
    Ebrahimi, R.
    Gallo, L.
    Ranneberg, B.
    Mertenskoetter, T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 14 (05) : 195 - 199
  • [3] Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients - 144-week analysis
    Arribas, Jose R.
    Pozniak, Anton L.
    Gallant, Joel E.
    DeJesus, Edwin
    Gazzard, Brian
    Campo, Rafael E.
    Chen, Shan-Shan
    McColl, Damian
    Holmes, Charles B.
    Enejosa, Jeffrey
    Toole, John J.
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    [J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2008, 47 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [4] Lack of pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and nelfinavir mesylate
    Boffito, M
    Pozniak, A
    Kearney, BP
    Higgs, C
    Mathias, A
    Zhong, LJ
    Shah, J
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (10) : 4386 - 4389
  • [5] Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard gel/ritonavir (1000/100 mg twice daily) when administered with tenofovir diproxil fumarate in HIV-1-infected subjects
    Boffito, M
    Back, D
    Stainsby-Tron, M
    Hill, A
    Di Perri, G
    Moyle, G
    Nelson, M
    Tomkins, J
    Gazzard, B
    Pozniak, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 59 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [6] BREIHL D, 2004, 44 INT C ANT AG CHEM
  • [7] Pharmacokinetics of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir mesylate administered alone or in combination at steady state
    Chittick, GE
    Zong, J
    Blum, MR
    Sorbel, JJ
    Begley, JA
    Adda, N
    Kearney, BP
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (04) : 1304 - 1310
  • [8] Cihlar T, 2007, ANTIVIR THER, V12, P267
  • [9] Randomized study of dual versus single ritonavir-enhanced protease inhibitors for protease inhibitor-experienced patients with HIV
    Collier, Ann C.
    Tierney, Camlin
    Downey, Gerald F.
    Eshleman, Susan H.
    Kashuba, Angela
    Klingman, Karin
    Vergis, Emanuel N.
    Pakes, Gary E.
    Rooney, James F.
    Rinehart, Alex
    Mellors, John W.
    [J]. HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 9 (02): : 91 - 102
  • [10] Influence of tenofovir, nevirapine and efavirenz on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients
    Dailly, Eric
    Tribut, Olivier
    Tattevin, Pierre
    Arvieux, Cedric
    Perre, Philippe
    Raffi, Francois
    Jolliet, Pascale
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 62 (07) : 523 - 526