Simulation of Hydrogen Production with In Situ CO2 Removal Using Aspen Plus

被引:4
作者
Likkasith, Chonnawee [1 ]
Saebea, Dang [2 ]
Arpornwichanop, Amornchai [3 ]
Piemnernkooma, Nirut [1 ]
Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn [1 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Inst Technol Ladkrabang, Fac Engn, Sch Chem Engn, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
[2] Burapha Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Comp Proc Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
来源
PRES 2014, 17TH CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, PTS 1-3 | 2014年 / 39卷
关键词
STEAM; GLYCEROL; METHANE;
D O I
10.3303/CET1439070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this work, the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) in which the integration of steam reforming reaction and carbon dioxide removal can be carried out in a single step was investigated in the thermodynamics aspects by using AspenPlus (TM). Thermodynamics analysis was performed on both conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) and sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming processes based on minimization of Gibbs free energy method to determine the favorable operating conditions of each process. The effects of operating conditions (i.e., pressure, temperature and steam to carbon ratio) on hydrogen production were examined. The simulation results show that the optimal steam to carbon ratio is 6 and 5 for SMR and SE-SMR process, respectively. For SMR process, the maximum hydrogen purity of 78 % (dry basis) can be obtained at 950 K. While, the SE-SMR process offers two advantages over SMR process: (1) higher purity of hydrogen product can be achieved to 99 % (dry basis) and (2) required operating temperature is lower in the range of 700-850 K which is 100-150 K lower than SMR process, indicating that the SE-SMR process is less requirement of energy consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process [J].
Balasubramanian, B ;
Ortiz, AL ;
Kaytakoglu, S ;
Harrison, DP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (15-16) :3543-3552
[2]   Methane Steam Reforming in a Staged Membrane Reactor: Influence of the Number of Stages and Amount of Catalyst [J].
Caravella, A. ;
Di Maio, F. P. ;
Di Renzo, A. .
ICHEAP-9: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2009, 17 :25-30
[3]   Thermodynamic analyses of adsorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol for hydrogen production [J].
Chen, Haisheng ;
Zhang, Tianfu ;
Dou, Bilin ;
Dupont, Valerie ;
Williams, Paul ;
Ghadiri, Mojtaba ;
Ding, Yulong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (17) :7208-7222
[4]   Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO2 Capture [J].
Collodi, Guido .
CISAP4: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRY, 2010, 19 :37-42
[5]   Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol: Issues and challenges [J].
Dou, Binlin ;
Song, Yongchen ;
Wang, Chao ;
Chen, Haisheng ;
Xu, Yujie .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 30 :950-960
[6]   Sorption enhanced steam hydrogasification of coal for synthesis gas production with in-situ CO2 removal and self-sustained hydrogen supply [J].
Liu, Zhongzhe ;
Park, Chan S. ;
Norbeck, Joseph M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (17) :7016-7025
[7]   Evaluation of Hydrogen Sorption Enhanced Reforming with CO2 Capture [J].
Ochoa-Fernandez, Esther ;
Jensen, Staale F. ;
Rytter, Erling ;
Borresen, Borre T. ;
Krogh, Bente .
PRES 2012: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2012, 29 :991-996
[8]   Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of propane: A thermodynamic investigation [J].
Wang, Xiaodong ;
Wang, Na ;
Wang, Liang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :466-472