The economic effects of immigration into the United Kingdom

被引:49
作者
Coleman, D [1 ]
Rowthorn, R
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Social Work, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00034.x
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES the economic impact of immigration. The main emphasis is on the United Kingdom, but extensive material is also provided on other countries, both for comparison and to fill in certain gaps in the British evidence. Since 1997 a new UK immigration policy has displaced previous policy aims, which were focused on minimizing settlement. Large-scale immigration is now officially considered to be essential for the UK's economic wellbeing and beneficial for its society; measures have been introduced to increase inflows. The benefits claimed include fiscal advantages, increased gross domestic product per head, a ready supply of labor, and improvements to the age structure. Fears that large-scale immigration might damage the interests of unskilled native workers are discounted. We examine these claims as they relate to population and economy. We conclude that the economic consequences of large-scale immigration are mostly trivial, negative, or transient; that the interests of more vulnerable sections of the domestic population may well be damaged; and that any small fiscal or other economic benefits are unlikely to bear comparison with immigration's substantial and permanent demographic and environmental impact. We demonstrate that such findings are in line with those from other developed countries.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / +
页数:47
相关论文
共 136 条
[21]  
Chami R., 2003, Are immigrant remittances flows a source of Capital for Development? IMF working paper
[22]  
CHAND SK, 1996, 147 WASH DC INT MONT
[23]  
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (n/k/a Chicago Council on Global Affairs), 2004, KEEP PROM IMM PROP H
[24]   Replacement migration, or why everyone is going to have to live in Korea: a fable for our times from the United Nations [J].
Coleman, DA .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 357 (1420) :583-598
[25]  
COLEMAN DA, 2000, WHOS AFRAID LOW SUPP
[26]  
COLEMAN DA, 1997, POLICY STUDIES, V17, P195
[27]  
COLLADO MD, 2003, QUANTIFYING IMPACT I
[28]  
*CTR LAB MARK STUD, 2002, IMM WORK GREAT AM JO
[29]  
*CTR LAB MARK STUD, 2003, HIDD CRIS HIGH SCH D
[30]  
DEJONG A, 1999, POPULATION LABOUR FO