Board interlocks, absorptive capacity, and environmental performance

被引:29
作者
Lu, Jing [1 ]
Mahmoudian, Fereshteh [2 ]
Yu, Dongning [3 ]
Nazari, Jamal A. [2 ]
Herremans, Irene M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Gordon S Lang Sch Business & Econ, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Beedie Sch Business, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[3] Ryerson Univ, Ted Rogers Sch Management, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Haskayne Sch Business, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
absorptive capacity; board interlocks; diversity in board interlocks; environmental performance; leading performers; R& D investment; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; GENDER DIVERSITY; GOVERNANCE; STRATEGY; SUSTAINABILITY; DIFFUSION; KNOWLEDGE; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2811
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Coupling resource dependence theory with absorptive capacity concepts, we analyze the role absorptive capacity plays as a potential facilitator between board interlocks and environmental performance. Board interlocks act as avenues for knowledge and information that exist outside the organization to become resources to improve environmental performance. However, an organization also needs the ability to utilize knowledge to implement activities that lead to better environmental performance. Our results show that firms with a diversity of interlocks (greater number of board interlocks, interlocks in the same and different industries, and interlocks with top performers) achieve better environmental performance. Furthermore, we find that absorptive capacity, as measured by research and development (R&D) intensity, moderates the relationship between board interlocks and environmental performance.
引用
收藏
页码:3425 / 3443
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Abernathy M.A., 1996, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V13, P569, DOI [10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.TB00515.X]
  • [2] Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries
    Alam, Md. Samsul
    Atif, Muhammad
    Chien-Chi, Chu
    Soytas, Ugur
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 401 - 411
  • [3] The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality
    Amran, Azlan
    Lee, Shiau Ping
    Devi, S. Susela
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (04) : 217 - 235
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV
  • [5] Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness
    Bansal, P
    Roth, K
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) : 717 - 736
  • [6] Investigating the relationship between director's profile, board interlocks and corporate social responsibility
    Ben Barka, Hazar
    Dardour, Ali
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2015, 53 (03) : 553 - 570
  • [7] Bowen F.E., 2000, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V9, P92
  • [8] Shareholders' environmental profile and its impact on firm's environmental proactivity: An institutional approach
    Bueno-Garcia, Manuel
    Ortiz-Perez, Alejandro
    Mellado-Garcia, Elena
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (01) : 374 - 387
  • [9] Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research
    Certo, S. Trevis
    Busenbark, John R.
    Woo, Hyun-Soo
    Semadeni, Matthew
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (13) : 2639 - 2657
  • [10] Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments
    Cheng, Colin C. J.
    Shiu, Eric C.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (07) : 1245 - 1270