Real exchange rates and macroeconomics: evidence and theory

被引:30
作者
Devereux, MB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 1997年 / 30卷 / 4A期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/136269
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the early 1980s, a large body of research has thrown doubt on the relevance of macroeconomic models for understanding exchange rates. I argue that a balanced reading of recent literature in exchange rate economics gives a more optimistic assessment. Many studies have established the pertinence of long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) and the explanatory power of macroeconomic fundamentals in real exchange rate fluctuations. A reasonably strong case can be made for a traditional macroeconomic interpretation of real exchange rates, which emphasizes short-run price stickiness, but long-run PPP. But a central new ingredient in this interpretation is the presence of international commodity market segmentation and persistent deviations from the 'law of one price.' An example is given of a dynamic general equilibrium model that can reproduce some of the observed features of real exchange rate fluctuations.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 808
页数:36
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
AKERLOF GA, 1985, Q J ECON, V100, P823
[2]  
ALVAREZ A, 1996, MONEY EXCHANGE RATES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, FRONTIERS BUSINESS C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, REAL FINANCIAL LINKA
[5]  
Asea P. K., 1994, Review of International Economics, V2, P244
[6]   EMPIRICAL-MODELS OF THE EXCHANGE-RATE - SEPARATING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF [J].
BACKUS, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1984, 17 (04) :824-846
[7]  
Backus D., 1995, Frontiers in Business Cycle Research
[8]  
BACKUS DK, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P84
[9]   CONSUMPTION AND REAL EXCHANGE-RATES IN DYNAMIC ECONOMIES WITH NONTRADED GOODS [J].
BACKUS, DK ;
SMITH, GW .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 35 (3-4) :297-316
[10]   INTERNATIONAL REAL BUSINESS CYCLES [J].
BACKUS, DK ;
KEHOE, PJ ;
KYDLAND, FE .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (04) :745-775