Graphical displays of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for use in clinical practice: What makes a pro picture worth a thousand words?

被引:58
作者
Bantug, Elissa T. [1 ]
Coles, Theresa [2 ]
Smith, Katherine C. [1 ,3 ]
Snyder, Claire F. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Rouette, Julie [5 ]
Brundage, Michael D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Queens Canc Res Inst, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Graphic display of data; Patient centered care; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER-PATIENTS; TRIALS; INFORMATION; IMPACT; CARE; PATIENTVIEWPOINT; DESIGN; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) report patients' assessments of the impact of a health condition and its treatment, and can promote patient-centered care. Objectives: To address the effectiveness of graphic display of PRO data in clinical practice by reviewing existing literature, and current recommendations, regarding graphic presentations of PROs. Methods: We performed an integrated literature review to identify themes and emerging principles guiding effective graphic display of PRO data. The findings were placed in the context of the literature informing graphical presentation of other clinical data. Results: Although a large body of literature informs graphical presentation of clinical data, only nine empirical studies addressed presentation of PROs. Four major themes emerged: many patients and most clinicians can accurately interpret some PRO graphs; interpretation accuracy, personal preference, and perceived level of understanding are sometimes discordant; patient age and education may predict PRO graph comprehension; patients tend to prefer simpler graphs than do clinicians. Conclusions: Little empirical research specifically addresses graphic representation of PRO data. A single format may not work optimally for both clinicians and patients. Practice implications: Patients and clinicians may or may not comprehend PRO data when graphically presented. Further research to determine best practices for presenting PROs optimally is needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Automated Symptom Alerts Reduce Postoperative Symptom Severity After Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    Shi, Qiuling
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Wright, Sherry L.
    Berry, Madonna D.
    Malveaux, Donna
    Shah, Pankil K.
    Gning, Ibrahima
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Putnam, Joe B., Jr.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (08) : 994 - 1000
  • [12] Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients?
    Cocks, K.
    Velikova, G.
    King, M. T.
    Fayers, P. M.
    Brown, J. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2014, 23 (02) : 228 - 238
  • [13] Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication - A randomized controlled trial
    Detmar, SB
    Muller, MJ
    Schornagel, JH
    Wever, LDV
    Aaronson, NK
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (23): : 3027 - 3034
  • [14] Health related quality of life in prostate carcinoma patients - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Efficace, F
    Bottomley, A
    van Andel, G
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (02) : 377 - 388
  • [15] Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice
    Engelen, Vivian
    Haverman, Lotte
    Koopman, Hendrik
    Schouten-van Meeteren, Netteke
    Meijer-van den Bergh, Esther
    Vrijmoet-Wiersma, Jantien
    van Dijk, Elisabeth Maria
    Last, Bob
    Detmar, Symone
    Grootenhuis, Martha
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 81 (02) : 235 - 244
  • [16] Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    Kocovski, N
    McConnell, BA
    Brundage, MD
    Mackillop, WJ
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (02) : 228 - 238
  • [17] Numbers Can Be Worth a Thousand Pictures: Individual Differences in Understanding Graphical and Numerical Representations of Health-Related Information
    Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
    Wegwarth, Odette
    Skopec, David
    Mueller, Ann-Sophie
    Broschinski, Sebastian
    Politi, Mary C.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 31 (03) : 286 - 296
  • [18] The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?
    Greenhalgh, J
    Long, AF
    Flynn, R
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (04) : 833 - 843
  • [19] The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (01) : 115 - 123
  • [20] TRULY INEFFICIENT OR PROVIDING BETTER QUALITY OF CARE? ANALYSING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RISK-ADJUSTED HOSPITAL COSTS AND PATIENTS' HEALTH OUTCOMES
    Gutacker, Nils
    Bojke, Chris
    Daidone, Silvio
    Devlin, Nancy J.
    Parkin, David
    Street, Andrew
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 22 (08) : 931 - 947