Graphical displays of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for use in clinical practice: What makes a pro picture worth a thousand words?

被引:58
作者
Bantug, Elissa T. [1 ]
Coles, Theresa [2 ]
Smith, Katherine C. [1 ,3 ]
Snyder, Claire F. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Rouette, Julie [5 ]
Brundage, Michael D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Queens Canc Res Inst, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Graphic display of data; Patient centered care; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER-PATIENTS; TRIALS; INFORMATION; IMPACT; CARE; PATIENTVIEWPOINT; DESIGN; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) report patients' assessments of the impact of a health condition and its treatment, and can promote patient-centered care. Objectives: To address the effectiveness of graphic display of PRO data in clinical practice by reviewing existing literature, and current recommendations, regarding graphic presentations of PROs. Methods: We performed an integrated literature review to identify themes and emerging principles guiding effective graphic display of PRO data. The findings were placed in the context of the literature informing graphical presentation of other clinical data. Results: Although a large body of literature informs graphical presentation of clinical data, only nine empirical studies addressed presentation of PROs. Four major themes emerged: many patients and most clinicians can accurately interpret some PRO graphs; interpretation accuracy, personal preference, and perceived level of understanding are sometimes discordant; patient age and education may predict PRO graph comprehension; patients tend to prefer simpler graphs than do clinicians. Conclusions: Little empirical research specifically addresses graphic representation of PRO data. A single format may not work optimally for both clinicians and patients. Practice implications: Patients and clinicians may or may not comprehend PRO data when graphically presented. Further research to determine best practices for presenting PROs optimally is needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, PROQOLID DATABASE
  • [2] Added value of health-related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: the experience of the NCIC CTG
    Au, Heather-Jane
    Ringash, Jolie
    Brundage, Michael
    Palmer, Michael
    Richardson, Harriet
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [3] Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
    Basch, Ethan
    Jia, Xiaoyu
    Heller, Glenn
    Barz, Allison
    Sit, Laura
    Fruscione, Michael
    Appawu, Mark
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Atkinson, Thomas
    Goldfarb, Shari
    Culkin, Ann
    Kris, Mark G.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (23): : 1624 - 1632
  • [4] Berry D., 2004, ONCOL NURS FORUM, V31, P75
  • [5] Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: A study of six presentation formats
    Brundage, M
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    Leis, A
    Bezjak, A
    Degner, L
    Velji, K
    Zetes-Zanatta, L
    Tu, D
    Ritvo, P
    Pater, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (28) : 6949 - 6956
  • [6] Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: A qualitative study
    Brundage, M
    Leis, A
    Bezjak, A
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    Degner, L
    Velji, K
    Zetes-Zanatta, L
    Tu, D
    Ritvo, P
    Pater, J
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (04) : 395 - 404
  • [7] Brundage M.D., 2015, AM SOC CLIN ONC ANN
  • [8] Brundage MD., 2012, Clin Invest, V2, P343
  • [9] A knowledge translation challenge: clinical use of quality of life data from cancer clinical trials
    Brundage, Michael
    Bass, Brenda
    Jolie, Ringash
    Foley, Kimberley
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (07) : 979 - 985
  • [10] Issues and challenges with integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials supported by the national cancer institute-sponsored clinical trials networks
    Bruner, Deborah Watkins
    Bryan, Charlene J.
    Aaronson, Neil
    Blackmore, C. Craig
    Brundage, Michael
    Cella, David
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Hinds, Pamela S.
    Kornblith, Alice B.
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Sloan, Jeff
    Wenzel, Lari
    Whalen, Giles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) : 5051 - 5057