Preferred image quality metric for shifted superimposition-based resolution-enhanced images

被引:2
作者
Hansen, Svein Arne Jervell [1 ,2 ]
Akram, Muhammad Nadeem [1 ]
Hardeberg, Jon Yngve [3 ]
Pedersen, Marius [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway
[2] Barco Fredrikstad AS, Gamle Fredrikstad, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Gjovik, Norway
关键词
resolution; image quality; image processing; displays; projectors; projection systems; SIMILARITY;
D O I
10.1117/1.JEI.27.3.033017
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Shifted superimposition is a resolution-enhancement method that has gained popularity in the projector industry the last couple of years. This method consists of shifting every other projected frame spatially with subpixel precision, and by doing so creating a new pixel grid on the projected surface with smaller effective pixel pitch. There is still an open question of how well this technique performs in comparison with the native resolution, and how high the effective resolution gain really is. To help investigate these questions, we have developed a framework for simulating different superimposition methods over different image contents, and evaluate the result using several image quality metrics (IQMs). We have also performed a subjective experiment with observers who rate the simulated image content, and calculated the correlation between the subjective results and the IQMs. We found that the visual information fidelity metric is the most suitable to evaluate natural superimposed images when subjective match is desired. However, this metric does not detect the distortion in synthetic images. The multiscale structural similarity metric which is based on the analysis of image structure is better at detecting this distortion. (C) 2018 SPIE and IS&T
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, P SID S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Psychometric scaling, a toolkit for imaging systems development
  • [3] BARCO, 2018, WHIT PAP 4L UHD EXPL
  • [4] Barshan E., 2015, SID S, V46, P514, DOI DOI 10.1002/SDTP.10449
  • [5] Bylsma K., 2014, CAN YOU EXPL DET E S
  • [6] VSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images
    Chandler, Damon M.
    Hemami, Sheila S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 16 (09) : 2284 - 2298
  • [7] Image quality assessment based on a degradation model
    Damera-Venkata, N
    Kite, TD
    Geisler, WS
    Evans, BL
    Bovik, AC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2000, 9 (04) : 636 - 650
  • [8] Damera-Venkata N., 2007, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383463
  • [9] Egiazarian K., 2006, proceedings of the second international workshop on video processing and quality metrics, P4
  • [10] Hansen S. A. J., 2017, ELECT IMAGING IMAGE, V2017, P141