Contact-state monitoring of force-guided robotic assembly tasks using expectation maximization-based Gaussian mixtures models

被引:39
作者
Jasim, Ibrahim F. [1 ]
Plapper, Peter W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Fac Sci Technol & Commun, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Assembly monitoring; Expectation maximization; Gaussian mixtures; Peg-in-hole; Robotic assembly; RECOGNITION; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-014-5803-x
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article addresses the problem of contact-state (CS) monitoring for peg-in-hole force-controlled robotic assembly tasks. In order to perform such a monitoring target, the wrench (Cartesian forces and torques) and pose (Cartesian position and orientation) signals of the manipulated object are firstly captured for different CS's of the object (peg) with respect to the environment including the hole. The captured signals are employed in building a model (a recognizer) for each CS, and in the framework of pattern classification, the CS monitoring would be addressed. It will be shown that the captured signals are nonstationary, i.e., they have non-normal distribution that would result in performance degradation if using the available monitoring approaches. In this article, the concept of the Gaussian mixtures models (GMM) is used in building the likelihood of each signal and the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is employed in finding the GMM parameters. The use of the GMM would accommodate the signals nonstationary behavior and the EM algorithm would guarantee the estimation of the optimal parameters set of the GMM for each signal, and hence the modeling accuracy would be significantly enhanced. In order to see the performance of the suggested CS monitoring scheme, we installed a test stand that is composed of a KUKA lightweight robot (LWR) doing peg-in-hole tasks. Two experiments are considered; in the first experiment, we use the EM-GMM in monitoring a typical peg-in-hole robotic assembly process, and in the second experiment, we consider the robotic assembly of camshaft caps assembly of an automotive powertrain and use the EM-GMM in monitoring its CS's. For both experiments, the excellent monitoring performance will be shown. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the EM-GMM with that obtained when using available CS monitoring approaches. Classification success rate (CSR) and computational time will be considered as comparison indices, and the EM-GMM will be shown to have a superior CSR performance with reduced a computational time.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 633
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   PETRI-NET MODELING FOR ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY AND TRAJECTORY PLANNING [J].
MCCARRAGHER, BJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 1994, 41 (06) :631-640
[22]   Task primitives for the discrete event modeling and control of 6-DOF assembly tasks [J].
McCarragher, BJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1996, 12 (02) :280-289
[23]   Contact-state segmentation using particle filters for programming by human demonstration in compliant-motion tasks [J].
Meeussen, Wim ;
Rutgeerts, Johan ;
Gadeyne, Klaas ;
Bruyninckx, Herman ;
De Schutter, Joris .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2007, 23 (02) :218-231
[24]  
Mosemann H, 1998, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P3400, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.1998.726530
[25]  
Okuda H, 2008, 2008 PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, P1536
[26]  
Skubic M, 1997, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P284
[27]   Identifying single-ended contact formations from force sensor patterns [J].
Skubic, M ;
Volz, RA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2000, 16 (05) :597-603
[28]  
Skubic M, 1997, 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-4, P1623, DOI 10.1109/ICNN.1997.614137
[29]   A neural/fuzzy optimal process model for robotic part assembly [J].
Son, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2001, 41 (12) :1783-1794
[30]   Multi sensor fusion in robot assembly using particle filters [J].
Thomas, U. ;
Molkenstruck, S. ;
Iser, R. ;
Wahl, F. M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-10, 2007, :3837-+