Anastomotic Ulcer Perforation Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

被引:8
作者
Abu-Abeid, Adam [1 ]
Tome, Jawad [1 ]
Lahat, Guy [1 ,2 ]
Eldar, Shai Meron [1 ,2 ]
Dayan, Danit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Gen Surg, 6 Weizman St, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Gen Surg,Bariatr Unit, 6 Weizman St, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
One anastomosis gastric bypass; Anastomotic ulcer; Perforation; Complication; Bariatric metabolic surgery; SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS; MARGINAL ULCERS; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-022-06088-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Perforated anastomotic ulcer after one anastomosis gastric bypass Background One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a common bariatric metabolic surgery. Anastomotic ulcer ( AU) perforation is a delayed complication, liable to cause sepsis and death. We present a cohort of twelve patients who underwent emergent surgery due to AU perforation. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of a single center database of patients operated for AU perforation after OAGB (January 2015 to December 2021). Data retrieved included perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Results The incidence of AU perforation among 1425 OAGB patients is 0.7%. AU perforation occurred after OAGB at a median time interval of 13 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5, 23). Eight patients had at least one risk factor for AU perforation. All patients presented with acute abdominal pain. Pneumoperitoneum was evident in ten patients on imaging studies. Surgery was laparoscopic in eleven patients, with one conversion to laparotomy. Operative findings were AU perforation, with a median perforation size of 5 mm (IQR 1.1, 18.7). Laparoscopic omentopexy +/- primary AU repair, open omentopexy +/- primary AU repair, and laparoscopic conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were performed (n = 9, 2, 1 patients, respectively). Median length of stay was 7.5 days (IQR 5, 11.5). No major complications occurred. All patients are doing well at a median follow-up of 11.5 months (IQR 2.2, 19.2). Four out of seven smoking patients still smoke. Conclusion AU perforation after OAGB mandates a high index of suspicion, prompt diagnosis, and surgical treatment. Laparoscopic omentopexy +/- primary AU repair is feasible in most cases, safe, and confers good outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2366 / 2372
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Anastomotic Gastro-Jejunal Ulcer Perforation Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Clinical Presentation and Options of Management-Case Series and Review of Literature [J].
Abou Hussein, Bassem ;
Al Marzouqi, Omar ;
Khammas, Ali .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (06) :2423-2428
[2]   Diabetes resolution after one anastomosis gastric bypass [J].
Abu-Abeid, Adam ;
Lessing, Yonatan ;
Pencovich, Niv ;
Dayan, Danit ;
Klausner, Joseph M. ;
Abu-Abeid, Subhi .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (02) :181-185
[3]   Marginal ulcer causing delayed anastomotic perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) [J].
Aviran, Eyal ;
Rayman, Shlomi ;
Ben Yehuda, Amir ;
Goitein, David .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2021, 17 (02) :379-383
[4]  
Bennett J, 2015, OBES SURG, V25, pS80
[5]  
Bhandari M., 2018, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V14, pS135, DOI [10.1016/j.soard.2018.09.304, DOI 10.1016/J.SOARD.2018.09.304]
[6]   Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up [J].
Bruzzi, Matthieu ;
Rau, Cedric ;
Voron, Thibault ;
Guenzi, Martino ;
Berger, Anne ;
Chevallier, Jean-Marc .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (02) :321-326
[7]   Evaluation of Weight Loss Indicators and Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Outcomes [J].
Carbajo, Miguel A. ;
Jimenez, Jose M. ;
Luque-de-Leon, Enrique ;
Cao, Maria-Jose ;
Lopez, Maria ;
Garcia, Sara ;
Castro, Maria-Jose .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[8]   One Thousand Single Anastomosis (Omega Loop) Gastric Bypasses to Treat Morbid Obesity in a 7-Year Period: Outcomes Show Few Complications and Good Efficacy [J].
Chevallier, Jean Marc ;
Arman, Gustavo A. ;
Guenzi, Martino ;
Rau, Cedric ;
Bruzzi, Mathieu ;
Beaupel, Nathan ;
Zinzindohoue, Frank ;
Berger, Anne .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (06) :951-958
[9]   Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP [J].
Di Lorenzo, Nicola ;
Antoniou, Stavros A. ;
Batterham, Rachel L. ;
Busetto, Luca ;
Godoroja, Daniela ;
Iossa, Angelo ;
Carrano, Francesco M. ;
Agresta, Ferdinando ;
Alarcon, Isaias ;
Azran, Carmil ;
Bouvy, Nicole ;
Balague Ponz, Carmen ;
Buza, Maura ;
Copaescu, Catalin ;
De Luca, Maurizio ;
Dicker, Dror ;
Di Vincenzo, Angelo ;
Felsenreich, Daniel M. ;
Francis, Nader K. ;
Fried, Martin ;
Prats, Berta Gonzalo ;
Goitein, David ;
Halford, Jason C. G. ;
Herlesova, Jitka ;
Kalogridaki, Marina ;
Ket, Hans ;
Morales-Conde, Salvador ;
Piatto, Giacomo ;
Prager, Gerhard ;
Pruijssers, Suzanne ;
Pucci, Andrea ;
Rayman, Shlomi ;
Romano, Eugenia ;
Sanchez-Cordero, Sergi ;
Vilallonga, Ramon ;
Silecchia, Gianfranco .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (06) :2332-2358
[10]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213