Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. New tool for selecting candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy

被引:6
作者
Herranz-Amo, F. [1 ]
Molina-Escudero, R. [1 ]
Ogaya-Pinies, G. [1 ]
Ramirez-Martin, D. [1 ]
Verdu-Tartajo, F. [1 ]
Hernandez-Fernandez, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Serv Urol, Madrid, Spain
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2016年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词
MULTIINSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE NOMOGRAM; CANCER CONTROL; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; TRIAL; PSA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2015.07.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To design a risk summation to select patients for adjuvant radiation therapy after prostatectomy. Materials and method: A retrospective study was conducted on 629 patients with localised prostate cancer (pN0-pNx) who were treated with prostatectomy and with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value <0.2 ng/mL at 2-3 months. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a PSA >0.4 ng/mL. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. A score (0-2) was assigned according to the hazard ratio of the significant variables. The score summation defined the risk summation. Results: A total of 19.7% of the patients were pT3, 24.2% had a Gleason score >= 8, and 26.3% had positive surgical margins. The median follow-up was 82 months. Some 26.6% of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence. The identified prognostic variables independent of biochemical recurrence were a Gleason score =7 (4+3) (HR, 2.01; P=.008), a Gleason score >= 8 (HR, 3.07; P <.001), a pT3b stage (HR, 1.93; p=.008) and a positive surgical margin (HR, 2.20; P<.001). We assigned 0 points to patients without risk prognosis variables; 1 point to patients with Gleason scores =7 (4+ 3), pT3b or positive surgical margins; and 2 Points to patients with Gleason scores >= 8. The patients with a risk summation <= 2 had >50% survival free of biochemical recurrence at 5 and 8 years. In contrast, the patients with a risk summation >= 3 had <44% survival free of biochemical recurrence. Conclusion: The patients with a risk summation <= 2 did not benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy, while the patients with a risk summation >= 3 might benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. (C) 2015 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Selecting the Optimal Candidate for Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Long-term Survival Analysis [J].
Abdollah, Firas ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Cozzarini, Cesare ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Bianchi, Marco ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Passoni, Niccolo Maria ;
Fiorino, Claudio ;
Di Muzio, Nadia ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (06) :998-1008
[2]   Decreasing Rate and Extent of Lymph Node Staging in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy May Undermine the Rate of Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer [J].
Abdollah, Firas ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Thuret, Rodolphe ;
Budaeus, Lars ;
Jeldres, Claudio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (06) :882-892
[3]   Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy:: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) [J].
Bolla, M ;
van Poppel, H ;
Collette, L ;
van Cangh, P ;
Vekemans, K ;
Da Pozzo, L ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Verbaeys, A ;
Bosset, JF ;
van Velthoven, R ;
Maréchal, JM ;
Scalliet, P ;
Haustermans, K ;
Piérart, M .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9485) :572-578
[4]  
Borque Fernando A, 2012, ARCH ESP UROL, V65, P39
[5]   Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Does Not Compromise Cancer Control in Patients with pT3N0 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Match-controlled Multi-institutional Analysis [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Cozzarini, Cesare ;
Bianchi, Marco ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Budiharto, Tom ;
Hinkelbein, Wolfgang ;
Di Muzio, Nadia ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Van Poppel, Hein .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) :472-487
[6]   Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Multiplicative Interaction Between Surgical Margin Status and Pathological Stage [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Eichelberg, Christian ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Chun, Felix K. H. ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Sauter, Guido ;
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Zacharias, Mario ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04) :1341-1346
[7]   A multi-institutional analysis comparing adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients with undetectable PSA after prostatectomy [J].
Budiharto, Tom ;
Perneel, Christiaan ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Junius, Sara ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Scalliet, Pierre ;
Renard, Laurette ;
Lerut, Evelyne ;
Vekemans, Kris ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (03) :474-479
[8]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[9]   Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy - A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Partin, AW ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Walsh, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) :286-292
[10]   Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Sutter, ME ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (02) :365-369