Origins of the activity of PAL and LAP enzyme inhibitors: Toward ab initio binding affinity prediction

被引:19
作者
Dyguda, E
Grembecka, J
Sokalski, WA
Leszczynski, J
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Dept Chem, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Jackson State Univ, Jackson, MS USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja042691v
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Interaction energies of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) active site residues with a series of PAL inhibitors have been partitioned into electrostatic, exchange, delocalization, and correlation components and compared with analogous results obtained previously for leucine aminopeptidase (LAP). In the latter metalloenzyme, either of the two charged residues controls entirely relative inhibitor binding energies, while at least four residues are required to determine ligand relative stabilization in neutral PAL. Significant correlation with experimental inhibitory activity was found between the stabilization energy at gradually decreasing levels of theory (MP2, SCF) down to the first-order Heitler-London term. Contrary to the LAP case, where the electrostatic term was sufficient to reproduce experimentally observed trends, in the case of PAL, exchange repulsion effects also have to be considered. Computational protocol presented herein constitutes a promising way to incorporate the first principle calculation's accuracy into the process of rational binding affinity prediction, revealing the physical nature of the interactions, where successive approximations can be introduced in a systematic and justifiable manner. Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1659
页数:2
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Crystal structure of phenylalanine ammonia lyase: Multiple helix dipoles implicated in catalysis [J].
Calabrese, JC ;
Jordan, DB ;
Boodhoo, A ;
Sariaslani, S ;
Vannelli, T .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 43 (36) :11403-11416
[2]  
Garmer DR, 1998, PROTEINS, V31, P42
[3]   Non-empirical analysis of the nature of the inhibitor-active-site interactions in leucine aminopeptidase [J].
Grembecka, J ;
Kedzierski, P ;
Sokalski, WA .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1999, 313 (1-2) :385-392
[4]   Electrostatic models of inhibitory activity [J].
Grembecka, J ;
Kedzierski, P ;
Sokalski, WA ;
Leszczynski, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2001, 83 (3-4) :180-192
[5]   PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY OF PHENYLPROPANOID METABOLISM [J].
HAHLBROCK, K ;
SCHEEL, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1989, 40 :347-369
[6]   A priori prediction of ligand affinity by energy minimization [J].
Holloway, MK .
PERSPECTIVES IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND DESIGN, 1998, 9-11 :63-84
[7]   Binding affinities of host-guest, protein-ligand, and protein-transition-state complexes [J].
Houk, KN ;
Leach, AG ;
Kim, SP ;
Zhang, XY .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2003, 42 (40) :4872-4897
[8]  
Langer B, 2001, ADV PROTEIN CHEM, V58, P175
[9]   Binding affinity and specificity from computational studies [J].
Lazaridis, T .
CURRENT ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2002, 6 (14) :1319-1332
[10]   SYNTHESIS, PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PHOSPHORUS ANALOGS OF PHENYLALANINE AND RELATED-COMPOUNDS [J].
MAIER, L ;
DIEL, PJ .
PHOSPHORUS SULFUR AND SILICON AND THE RELATED ELEMENTS, 1994, 90 (1-4) :259-279