Uncovering the Most Important Factors for Predicting Sexual Desire Using Explainable Machine Learning

被引:15
作者
Vowels, Laura M. [1 ,2 ]
Vowels, Matthew J. [3 ]
Mark, Kristen P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Dept Psychol, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Blueheart Technol Ltd, London, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Comp Vis Speech & Signal Proc CVSSP, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Minnesota, Med Sch, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Close Relationships; Sexual Desire; Machine Learning; Random Forests; Shapley Values; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; DISCREPANCY; IMPACT; SELF; MEN; DURATION; LOVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.04.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Low sexual desire is the most common sexual problem reported with 34% of women and 15% of men reporting lack of desire for at least 3 months in a 12-month period. Sexual desire has previously been associated with both relationship and individual well-being highlighting the importance of understanding factors that contribute to sexual desire as improving sexual desire difficulties can help improve an individual's overall quality of life. Aim: The purpose of the present study was to identify the most salient individual (eg, attachment style, attitudes toward sexuality, gender) and relational (eg, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, romantic love) predictors of dyadic and solitary sexual desire from a large number of predictor variables. Methods: Previous research has relied primarily on traditional statistical models which are limited in their ability to estimate a large number of predictors, non-linear associations, and complex interactions. We used a machine learning algorithm, random forest (a type of highly non-linear decision tree), to circumvent these issues to predict dyadic and solitary sexual desire from a large number of predictors across 2 online samples (N = 1,846; includes 754 individuals forming 377 couples). We also used a Shapley value technique to estimate the size and direction of the effect of each predictor variable on the model outcome. Outcomes: The outcomes included total, dyadic, and solitary sexual desire measured using the Sexual Desire Inventory. Results: The models predicted around 40% of variance in dyadic and solitary desire with women's desire being more predictable than men's overall. Several variables consistently predicted dyadic sexual desire such as sexual satisfaction and romantic love, and solitary desire such as masturbation and attitudes toward sexuality. These predictors were similar for both men and women and gender was not an important predictor of sexual desire. Clinical Translation: The results highlight the importance of addressing overall relationship satisfaction when sexual desire difficulties are presented in couples therapy. It is also important to understand clients' attitudes toward sexuality. Strengths & Limitations: The study improves on existing methodologies in the field and compares a large number of predictors of sexual desire. However, the data were cross-sectional and there may have been variables that are important for desire but were not present in the datasets. Conclusion: Higher sexual satisfaction and feelings of romantic love toward one's partner are important predictors of dyadic sexual desire whereas regular masturbation and more permissive attitudes toward sexuality predicted solitary sexual desire. Copyright (C) 2021, International Society of Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1216
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [11] Sexual desire in later life
    DeLamater, JD
    Sill, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (02) : 138 - 149
  • [12] Diamond LM, 2012, CLIN NEUROPSYCHIATR, V9, P39
  • [13] Ellison CR, 2001, WOMEN THER, V24, P147
  • [14] Predicting couple satisfaction: the role of differentiation of self, sexual desire and intimacy in heterosexual individuals
    Ferreira, Luana Cunha
    Narciso, Isabel
    Novo, Rosa Ferreira
    Pereira, Cicero Roberto
    [J]. SEXUAL AND RELATIONSHIP THERAPY, 2014, 29 (04) : 390 - 404
  • [15] Fisher T D, 1988, J Sex Res, V24, P90, DOI 10.1080/00224498809551400
  • [16] Machine learning meets partner matching: Predicting the future relationship quality based on personality traits
    Grossmann, Inga
    Hottung, Andre
    Krohn-Grimberghe, Artus
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [17] Linking romantic love with sex: Development of the perceptions of love and sex scale
    Hendrick, SS
    Hendrick, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 19 (03) : 361 - 378
  • [18] Sexual Desire Discrepancy as a Feature, Not a Bug, of Long-Term Relationships: Women's Self-Reported Strategies for Modulating Sexual Desire
    Herbenick, Debby
    Mullinax, Margo
    Mark, Kristen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (09) : 2196 - 2206
  • [19] FEMALE SEXUAL DESIRE, RESPONSE, AND BEHAVIOR
    HURLBERT, DF
    APT, C
    [J]. BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1994, 18 (04) : 488 - 504
  • [20] On the overestimation of random forest's out-of-bag error
    Janitza, Silke
    Hornung, Roman
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):