Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing

被引:54
作者
Scheperle, Rachel A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Tejani, Viral D. [1 ,2 ]
Omtvedt, Julia K. [1 ]
Brown, Carolyn J. [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Marlan R. [2 ]
Gantz, Bruce J. [2 ]
Oleson, Jacob J. [3 ]
Ozanne, Marie V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Montclair State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 1515 Broad St,Second Floor, Bloomfield, NJ 07003 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Electrode impedance; Electrically evoked compound action potential; MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE; ROUND WINDOW; INNER-EAR; FIBROSIS; OUTCOMES; INCREASES; SURGERY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 57
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Abbas P.J., EAR HEAR
  • [2] Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation
    Adunka, O
    Gstoettner, W
    Hambek, M
    Unkelbach, MH
    Radeloff, A
    Kiefer, J
    [J]. ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 2004, 66 (06): : 306 - 312
  • [3] Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Insertions: Influence on Functional Outcomes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Adunka, Marcia C.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) : 613 - 618
  • [4] Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: A dose response study
    Bas, Esperanza
    Bohorquez, Jorge
    Goncalves, Stefania
    Perez, Enrique
    Dinh, Christine T.
    Garnham, Carolyn
    Hessler, Roland
    Eshraghi, Adrien A.
    Van De Water, Thomas R.
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 337 : 12 - 24
  • [5] Spiral ganglion cells and macrophages initiate neuro-inflammation and scarring following cochlear implantation
    Bas, Esperanza
    Goncalves, Stefania
    Adams, Michelle
    Dinh, Christine T.
    Bas, Jose M.
    Van De Water, Thomas R.
    Eshraghi, Adrien A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [6] Briggs Robert J S, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P42, DOI 10.1159/000095613
  • [7] Effects of Long-Term Use of a Cochlear Implant on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Etler, Christine P.
    O'Brien, Sara
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [8] Busby P A, 2002, Cochlear Implants Int, V3, P87, DOI 10.1179/cim.2002.3.2.87
  • [9] Cochlear Response Telemetry: Intracochlear Electrocochleography via Cochlear Implant Neural Response Telemetry Pilot Study Results
    Campbell, Luke
    Kaicer, Arielle
    Briggs, Robert
    O'Leary, Stephen
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (03) : 399 - 405
  • [10] PREFERRED METHOD FOR CLINICAL DETERMINATION OF PURE-TONE THRESHOLDS
    CARHART, R
    JERGER, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1959, 24 (04): : 330 - 345