A comparison of kinematic algorithms to estimate gait events during overground running

被引:43
作者
Smith, Laura [1 ]
Preece, Stephen [1 ]
Mason, Duncan [1 ]
Bramah, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
关键词
Running; Gait events; Kinematic algorithm; Event detection; Phase determination; TREADMILL; POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The gait cycle is frequently divided into two distinct phases, stance and swing, which can be accurately determined from ground reaction force data. In the absence of such data, kinematic algorithms can be used to estimate footstrike and toe-off. The performance of previously published algorithms is not consistent between studies. Furthermore, previous algorithms have not been tested at higher running speeds nor used to estimate ground contact times. Therefore the purpose of this study was to both develop a new, custom-designed, event detection algorithm and compare its performance with four previously tested algorithms at higher running speeds. Kinematic and force data were collected on twenty runners during overground running at 5.6 m/s. The five algorithms were then implemented and estimated times for footstrike, toe-off and contact time were compared to ground reaction force data. There were large differences in the performance of each algorithm. The custom-designed algorithm provided the most accurate estimation of footstrike (True Error 1.2 +/- 17.1 ms) and contact time (True Error 3.5 +/- 18.2 ms). Compared to the other tested algorithms, the custom-designed algorithm provided an accurate estimation of footstrike and toe-off across different footstrike patterns. The custom-designed algorithm provides a simple but effective method to accurately estimate footstrike, toe-off and contact time from kinematic data. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking [J].
Alton, F ;
Baldey, L ;
Caplan, S ;
Morrissey, MC .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (06) :434-440
[2]   PREDICTION OF HIP-JOINT CENTER LOCATION FROM EXTERNAL LANDMARKS [J].
BELL, AL ;
BRAND, RA ;
PEDERSEN, DR .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (01) :3-16
[3]   THE SPRING MASS MODEL FOR RUNNING AND HOPPING [J].
BLICKHAN, R .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1989, 22 (11-12) :1217-1227
[4]   POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[5]   GROUND REACTION FORCES IN DISTANCE RUNNING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
LAFORTUNE, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1980, 13 (05) :397-406
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[7]   Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking [J].
Dingwell, JB ;
Cusumano, JP ;
Cavanagh, PR ;
Sternad, D .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01) :27-32
[8]   Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running [J].
Fellin, Rebecca E. ;
Rose, William C. ;
Royer, Todd D. ;
Davis, Irene S. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2010, 13 (06) :646-650
[9]   Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data [J].
Hreljac, A ;
Stergiou, N .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2000, 38 (05) :503-506
[10]   Identifying gait events without a force plate during running: A comparison of methods [J].
Leitch, Jessica ;
Stebbins, Julie ;
Paolini, Gabriele ;
Zavatsky, Amy B. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 33 (01) :130-132