Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK

被引:17
作者
Damery, Sarah [1 ]
Clifford, Sue [1 ]
Wilson, Sue [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2010年 / 11卷
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; AUSTRALIAN GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; PRIMARY-CARE; NATIONAL-SURVEY; PHYSICIANS; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; BELIEFS; PILOT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-11-20
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the UK. Five-year survival rates are less than 50%, largely because of late diagnosis. Screening using faecal occult blood tests (FOBt) can detect bowel cancer at an earlier stage than symptomatic presentation, and has the potential to significantly decrease colorectal cancer mortality. However, uptake of screening is currently low, despite the introduction of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (NHSBCSP), and it has been suggested that GP recommendations of screening can improve patient compliance. GP recommendation of CRC screening is argued to be affected by attitudes towards it, along with perceptions of its efficacy. Methods: This paper presents the findings of a cross-sectional postal survey of GPs in the UK which aimed to investigate GPs' attitudes in relation to colorectal cancer screening and the use of FOBt in routine practice. An 'attitude' score was calculated, and binary logistic regression used to evaluate the association of socio-demographic and general practice attributes with attitudes towards CRC screening and FOBt. Results: Of 3,191 GPs surveyed, 960 returned usable responses (response rate 30.7%). Positive attitudes were associated with personal experience of CRC screening and Asian or Asian British ethnicity. GPs from practices located in more deprived locations were also more likely to have positive attitudes towards FOBt and its recommendation to patients. Conclusions: The success of population-based screening for CRC will largely be determined by GP attitudes and support, particularly with regard to FOBt. Previous research has implied that South Asian GPs are more likely to have negative attitudes towards FOBt screening, however, our research suggests that this is not a group requiring targeted interventions to increase their support for the NHSBCSP. Of the available CRC screening tests, GPs perceived FOBt to be the most appropriate for population-based screening.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of physician reminders in faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening
    Siddiqui, Muhammed Rafay Sameem
    Sajid, Muhammad Shafiq
    Khatri, Kamran
    Kanri, Bipul
    Cheek, Elizabeth
    Baig, Mirza Khurrum
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (04) : 221 - 228
  • [22] Rawl's questionnaire spanish validation for colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing
    Menendez Rodriguez, Martin
    Garau Ramirez, Jorge
    Traver Salvador, Alba
    Hervas Jimenez, Yesica
    Garcia Morales, Natalia
    Seoane Pillado, Teresa
    Pin Vieito, Noel
    Vega Villaamil, Pablo
    Montes Martinez, Agustin
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA, 2022, 45 (02): : 106 - 113
  • [23] A comparative study of faecal occult blood kits in a colorectal cancer screening program in a cohort of healthy construction workers
    Shuhaibar, M.
    Walsh, C.
    Lindsay, F.
    Lee, N.
    Walsh, P.
    O'Gorman, P.
    Boran, G.
    McLoughlin, R.
    Qasim, A.
    Breslin, N.
    Ryan, B.
    O'Connor, H.
    O'Morain, C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 180 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [24] Analysis of deaths occurring within the Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer
    Whynes, D. K.
    Mangham, C. M.
    Balfour, T. W.
    Scholefield, J. H.
    GUT, 2010, 59 (08) : 1088 - 1093
  • [25] Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
    Benito, Llucia
    Travier, Noemie
    Binefa, Gemma
    Vidal, Carmen
    Espinosa, Jose
    Mila, Nuria
    Garcia, Montse
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (05) : 327 - 334
  • [26] Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: A narrative review
    Sazali, Mohd Fazeli
    Rahim, Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul
    Hayati, Firdaus
    Daud, Mohd Nazri Mohd
    Avoi, Richard
    Omar, Azizan
    Atil, Azman
    Abd Rahim, Muhammad Aklil
    Madrim, Mohd Faizal
    Mokti, Khalid
    Ramdzan, Abdul Rahman
    Ahmad, Zulkhairul Naim Sidek
    Zakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen
    Ani, Mohd Firdaus Che
    Ibrahim, Aini Fahriza
    Azhar, Zahir Izuan
    Jeffree, Mohammad Saffree
    Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [27] Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test in Catalonia, Spain
    Garcia, Montse
    Maria Borras, Josep
    Binefa, Gemma
    Mila, Nuria
    Alfons Espinas, Josep
    Moreno, Victor
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (01) : 42 - 45
  • [28] Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake
    Todorov, Kamelia
    Wilson, Carlene
    Sharplin, Greg
    Corsini, Nadia
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2018, 42 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [29] High yield of colorectal neoplasia detected by colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
    Lee, Thomas J. W.
    Clifford, Gayle M.
    Rajasekhar, Praveen
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Kometa, Simon
    Ritchie, Mary C.
    Waddup, Greg
    Nylander, David
    McNally, Richard J. Q.
    Rees, Colin J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (02) : 82 - 86
  • [30] Colorectal cancer screening by guaiac faecal occult blood test in France: Evaluation of the programme two years after launching
    Leuraud, Klervi
    Jezewski-Serra, Delphine
    Viguier, Jerome
    Salines, Emmanuelle
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (06) : 959 - 967