The effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition on breast cancer staging and prognostication

被引:12
作者
Savage, Paul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Nancy [3 ]
Dumitra, Sinziana [3 ,4 ]
Meterissian, Sarkis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Rosalind & Morris Goodman Canc Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3G 0B1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Div Expt Med, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ H4A 3T2, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H4A 3T2, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2019年 / 45卷 / 10期
关键词
Breast cancer; AJCC eighth edition; Stage; Prognostic staging; Anatomical staging; Prognosis; SYSTEM; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Breast cancer staging has been developed to quantify prognosis and guide treatment. The American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition manual (AJCC8) departed from traditional anatomic staging by incorporating biological factors such as grade, hormone and HER2 receptor status into a novel prognostic staging model. The aim of this study was to externally validate AJCC8 prognostic staging. Methods: This retrospective cohort investigated patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 at the McGill University Health Center. Patients were classified using both anatomic and prognostic staging systems according AJCC8. Overall survival analysis using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was performed and model accuracy was evaluated using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: The cohort included 1703 women. Anatomic and prognostic stage assignments displayed discrepancies for 46.2% of patients, where 38.8% were downstaged and 7.5% were upstaged with prognostic staging. Patients with anatomic stages IB, HA, IIB, IIIA and IIIC had high rates of downstaging (64.6-96.5%), as opposed to anatomic stages IA and IIIB where 93.1% and 75.0% of patients stage remained unchanged, respectively. The prognostic stage displayed increased prognostic accuracy with respect to overall survival, where the C-index was significantly higher compared to anatomic staging (0.810 vs 0.799, p < 0.05). In addition, prognostic staging displayed an improved model fit with a lower AIC (983.9) compared to anatomic staging (995.2). Conclusion: Prognostic and anatomic staging differ in their classification of patients, where prognostic staging displays improved accuracy, supporting its use in informing patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO - The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1820
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Breast Cancer
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1783 - 1785
  • [22] Analysis of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on colon cancer staging
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    Liang, Wen-Yih
    Li, Anna Fen-Yau
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [23] Assessment of the Prognostic Staging System of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition for Breast Cancer: Comparisons with the Conventional Anatomic Staging System
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Park, Hyung Seok
    Kim, Jee Ye
    Kim, Seung Il
    Cho, Young-Up
    Park, Byeong-Woo
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2020, 23 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [24] Challenges of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for pathologists focusing on early stage lung adenocarcinoma
    Wang, Yu-Ting
    Chang, Il-Chi
    Chen, Chih-Yi
    Hsia, Jiun-Yi
    Lin, Frank Cheau-Feng
    Chao, Wan-Ru
    Ke, Tuan-Ying
    Chen, Ya-Ting
    Chen, Chih-Jung
    Hsieh, Min-Shu
    Huang, Shiu-Feng
    THORACIC CANCER, 2023, 14 (06) : 592 - 601
  • [26] American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal cancer staging system: Discordance between clinical and pathological staging systems
    Hall, Scott R.
    Neel, Gregory S.
    Chang, Brent A.
    Howard, Brittany E.
    Nagel, Thomas H.
    Lott, David G.
    Hayden, Richard E.
    Zhang, Nan
    Hinni, Michael L.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (08): : 2716 - 2723
  • [27] Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system for gallbladder cancer and its lymphadenectomy guidelines
    Lee, Andrew J.
    Chiang, Yi-Ju
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Conrad, Claudius
    Chun, Yun-Shin
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 230 : 148 - 154
  • [28] Application of the Eighth Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Badhey, Arvind K.
    Olson, Ashley
    Kadakia, Sameep
    Russo, Jack
    Ting, Peter
    Khalid, Mian
    Yao, Mike
    Teng, Marita S.
    Genden, Eric M.
    Miles, Brett A.
    Chai, Raymond L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (05) : 1133 - 1139
  • [29] Changes in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging of Head and Neck Cancer: Rationale and Implications
    Zanoni, Daniella Karassawa
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (06)
  • [30] Validation of the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Jung, Hun
    Lee, Han Hong
    Song, Kyo Young
    Jeon, Hae Myung
    Park, Cho Hyun
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (11) : 2371 - 2378