Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: A study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification

被引:11
|
作者
Smulyan, Harold [1 ]
Mukherjee, Ratnakar [2 ]
Sheehe, Paul R. [3 ]
Safar, Michel E. [4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Syracuse, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13208 USA
[2] Baltimore Washington Med Ctr, Glen Burnie, MD USA
[3] SUNY Syracuse, Upstate Med Univ, Dept Neurosci & Physiol, Syracuse, NY 13208 USA
[4] Hop Hotel Dieu, Ctr Diagnost & Therapeut, F-75181 Paris, France
关键词
GENERALIZED TRANSFER-FUNCTION; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION; AUGMENTATION INDEX; CLINICAL UTILITY; PULSE PRESSURE; WAVE-FORM; VALIDATION; TONOMETRY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Central aortic systolic blood pressures (SBPs) differ from and are preferable to cuff pressures when calculating cardiac work, left ventricular wall stress, and rate-pressure product. Despite the widespread use of dobutamine, differences between aortic and brachial SBP (pulse amplification) and pulse transmission during dobutamine infusion have not been previously studied. This study assessed these differences and used applanated radial pulses with the Sphygmocor (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) device to investigate the effects of dobutamine on arterial pulse transmission and pulse amplification. Methods Using a cuff oscillometer, brachial arterial pressures were measured simultaneously with directly recorded aortic pressures at rest and during increasing dobutamine infusion rates in 25 patients. In 15 of those patients, applanated radial pulses were fed into the Sphygmocor device and calibrated in 2 ways to predict aortic pressures. Results At peak dobutamine infusion, SBP amplification averaged 14.9 mm Hg, with a maximum difference of 43 mm Hg. When radial artery pulses were calibrated using cuff pressures, the Sphygmocor underestimated the aortic SBP at all dobutamine doses. However, when radial artery pulses were calibrated using the more accurate aortic mean and diastolic BPs, the Sphygmocor accurately predicted the aortic SBP at baseline, but not at the higher dobutamine doses. Conclusions Similar to exercise, dobutamine induced cuff SBPs and pulse pressures higher than those measured in the aorta-uncorrected by the cuff-calibrated Sphygmocor. This increasing pulse amplification was explained by the effects of dobutamine on the properties of the conduit arterial walls, on changes in pulse wave velocity, on increasing heart rate, and on reflected waves. (Am Heart J 2010; 159: 399-405.)
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification
    Nakagomi, Atsushi
    Okada, Sho
    Shoji, Toshihiro
    Kobayashi, Yoshio
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (03) : 237 - 242
  • [22] Effects of olmesartan medoxomil on systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure in the management of hypertension
    Giles, TD
    Robinson, TD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (08) : 690 - 695
  • [23] ESTIMATION OF CENTRAL AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE FROM NON-INVASIVE CUFF PRESSURE OSCILLATION SIGNALS VIA SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
    Ghasemi, Zahra
    Kim, Chang-Sei
    Ginsberg, Eric
    Duell, John
    Gupta, Anuj
    Hahn, Jin-Oh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 9TH ANNUAL DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 1, 2017,
  • [24] Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure Exhibits Advantages Over Brachial Blood Pressure Measurements in Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction in Women
    Zhang, Linfeng
    Wang, Zengwu
    Chen, Zuo
    Wang, Xin
    Tian, Ye
    Shao, Lan
    Zhu, Manlu
    KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (04) : 1375 - 1387
  • [25] Identifying Isolated Systolic Hypertension From Upper-Arm Cuff Blood Pressure Compared With Invasive Measurements
    Picone, Dean S.
    Schultz, Martin G.
    Armstrong, Matthew K.
    Black, J. Andrew
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    Chen, Chen-Huan
    Cheng, Hao-Min
    Cremer, Antoine
    Dwyer, Nathan
    Hughes, Alun D.
    Kim, Hack-Lyoung
    Lacy, Peter S.
    Laugesen, Esben
    Liang, Fuyou
    Ohte, Nobuyuki
    Okada, Sho
    Omboni, Stefano
    Ott, Christian
    Pereira, Telmo
    Pucci, Giacomo
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    Sinha, Manish D.
    Stouffer, George A.
    Takazawa, Kenji
    Roberts-Thomson, Philip
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    Weber, Thomas
    Westerhof, Berend E.
    Williams, Bryan
    Sharman, James E.
    HYPERTENSION, 2021, 77 (02) : 632 - 639
  • [26] The acute effects of smokeless tobacco on central aortic blood pressure and wave reflection characteristics
    Martin, Jeffrey S.
    Beck, Darren T.
    Gurovich, Alvaro N.
    Braith, Randy W.
    EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 235 (10) : 1263 - 1268
  • [27] Gender differences of aortic wave reflection and influence of menopause on central blood pressure in patients with arterial hypertension
    Costa-Hong, Valeria Aparecida
    Simbo Muela, Henrique Cotchi
    Macedo, Thiago Andrade
    Kluser Sales, Allan Robson
    Bortolotto, Luiz Aparecido
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [28] Role of pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, in the prediction of cardiovascular risk.: Cohort study
    Miguel Baena-Diez, Jose
    Bermudez-Chillida, Noemi
    Garcia-Lareo, Manel
    Olivia Byram, Alice
    Vidal-Solsona, Marc
    Vilato-Garcia, Monica
    Gomez-Fernandez, Claudia
    Ernesto Vasquez-Lazo, Javier
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2008, 130 (10): : 361 - 365
  • [29] Evaluation of the oscillometric method for noninvasive blood pressure measurement during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial blood pressure
    Celler, Branko G.
    Yong, Andy
    Rubenis, Imants
    Butlin, Mark
    Argha, Ahmadreza
    Rehan, Rajan
    Avolio, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2024, 42 (07) : 1235 - 1247
  • [30] Central Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Pressures during Hemodialysis
    Al-Said, Jafar
    Suyao, Corazon
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 32 (01) : 170 - 173