Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: A study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification

被引:11
|
作者
Smulyan, Harold [1 ]
Mukherjee, Ratnakar [2 ]
Sheehe, Paul R. [3 ]
Safar, Michel E. [4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Syracuse, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13208 USA
[2] Baltimore Washington Med Ctr, Glen Burnie, MD USA
[3] SUNY Syracuse, Upstate Med Univ, Dept Neurosci & Physiol, Syracuse, NY 13208 USA
[4] Hop Hotel Dieu, Ctr Diagnost & Therapeut, F-75181 Paris, France
关键词
GENERALIZED TRANSFER-FUNCTION; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION; AUGMENTATION INDEX; CLINICAL UTILITY; PULSE PRESSURE; WAVE-FORM; VALIDATION; TONOMETRY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Central aortic systolic blood pressures (SBPs) differ from and are preferable to cuff pressures when calculating cardiac work, left ventricular wall stress, and rate-pressure product. Despite the widespread use of dobutamine, differences between aortic and brachial SBP (pulse amplification) and pulse transmission during dobutamine infusion have not been previously studied. This study assessed these differences and used applanated radial pulses with the Sphygmocor (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) device to investigate the effects of dobutamine on arterial pulse transmission and pulse amplification. Methods Using a cuff oscillometer, brachial arterial pressures were measured simultaneously with directly recorded aortic pressures at rest and during increasing dobutamine infusion rates in 25 patients. In 15 of those patients, applanated radial pulses were fed into the Sphygmocor device and calibrated in 2 ways to predict aortic pressures. Results At peak dobutamine infusion, SBP amplification averaged 14.9 mm Hg, with a maximum difference of 43 mm Hg. When radial artery pulses were calibrated using cuff pressures, the Sphygmocor underestimated the aortic SBP at all dobutamine doses. However, when radial artery pulses were calibrated using the more accurate aortic mean and diastolic BPs, the Sphygmocor accurately predicted the aortic SBP at baseline, but not at the higher dobutamine doses. Conclusions Similar to exercise, dobutamine induced cuff SBPs and pulse pressures higher than those measured in the aorta-uncorrected by the cuff-calibrated Sphygmocor. This increasing pulse amplification was explained by the effects of dobutamine on the properties of the conduit arterial walls, on changes in pulse wave velocity, on increasing heart rate, and on reflected waves. (Am Heart J 2010; 159: 399-405.)
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification
    Bui, Tan, V
    Picone, Dean S.
    Schultz, Martin G.
    Armstrong, Matthew K.
    Peng, Xiaoqing
    Black, J. Andrew
    Dwyer, Nathan
    Roberts-Thomson, Philip
    Adams, Heath
    Hughes, Alun D.
    Sharman, James E.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (10) : 2037 - 2044
  • [2] Is Noninvasive Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure an Accurate Estimate of Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure?
    Shih, Yuan-Ta
    Cheng, Hao-Min
    Sung, Shih-Hsien
    Chuang, Shao-Yuan
    Hu, Wei-Chih
    Chen, Chen-Huan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 29 (11) : 1283 - 1291
  • [3] Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure
    Kohara, K.
    Tabara, Y.
    Tomita, H.
    Nagai, T.
    Igase, M.
    Miki, T.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2009, 23 (08) : 538 - 545
  • [4] Invasively Measured Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure and Office Systolic Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in CKD
    Peters, Christian D.
    Olesen, Kevin K. W.
    Laugesen, Esben
    Maeng, Michael
    Botker, Hans Erik
    Poulsen, Per L.
    Buus, Niels Henrik
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2024, 9 (02): : 296 - 311
  • [5] Calibration of noninvasive central blood pressure devices and negative aortic-to-brachial systolic pressure amplification
    Papaioannou, Theodore G.
    Vavuranakis, Manolis
    Tousoulis, Dimitrios
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 91 (01) : 253 - 254
  • [6] Estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure from radial systolic and diastolic blood pressures alone using artificial neural networks
    Xiao, Hanguang
    Qasem, Ahmad
    Butlin, Mark
    Avolio, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (08) : 1577 - 1585
  • [7] Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification
    Fabry, Isabelle
    De Paepe, Peter
    Kips, Jan
    Vermeersch, Sebastian
    Van Bortel, Luc
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 67 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [8] Invasively Measured Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure and Office Systolic Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment A Prospective Cohort Study
    Laugesen, Esben
    Knudsen, Soren T.
    Hansen, Klavs W.
    Rossen, Niklas B.
    Jensen, Lisette Okkels
    Hansen, Michael G.
    Munkholm, Henrik
    Thomsen, Kristian K.
    Sondergaard, Hanne
    Bottcher, Morten
    Raungaard, Bent
    Madsen, Morten
    Hulman, Adam
    Witte, Daniel
    Botker, Hans Erik
    Poulsen, Per L.
    HYPERTENSION, 2016, 68 (03) : 768 - +
  • [9] Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure
    K Kohara
    Y Tabara
    H Tomita
    T Nagai
    M Igase
    T Miki
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2009, 23 : 538 - 545
  • [10] Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) to brachial systolic blood pressure (brachSBP) ratio reproducibility during antihypertensive therapy
    Bulas, J.
    Potocarova, M.
    Murin, J.
    Wimmerova, S.
    Gaspar, L.
    Turecky, L.
    Kovacova, E.
    Kupcova, V
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2021, 122 (10): : 695 - 699