GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictive factors of ovarian response to GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol: AMH and age are potential candidates
    Mohammed M. Laqqan
    Maged M. Yassin
    Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 26
  • [42] Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders
    Mutlu, Mehmet Firat
    Mutlu, Ilknur
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Guler, Ismail
    Erdem, Ahmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 47 (02) : 470 - 475
  • [43] The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
    Alebic, Miro Simun
    Stojanovic, Natasa
    Zuvic-Butorac, Marta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [44] Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol: a meta-analysis
    Baruffi, R. L. R.
    Mauri, A. L.
    Petersen, C. G.
    Felipe, V.
    Martins, A. M. C.
    Cornicelli, J.
    Cavagna, M.
    Oliveira, J. B. A.
    Franco, J. G., Jr.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [45] Factors associated with the efficacy of mature oocyte production after dual-trigger controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
    New, Geok Huey
    Wu, Wen-Bin
    Chen, Hsuan-Ting
    Lin, Jun-Jie
    Lai, Tsung-Hsuan
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (11) : 1008 - 1014
  • [46] Comparisons of GnRH Antagonist versus GnRH Agonist Protocol in Supposed Normal Ovarian Responders Undergoing IVF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiao, Jin-song
    Su, Cun-mei
    Zeng, Xian-tao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [47] What is the optimal GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation during ART treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Venetis, C. A.
    Storr, A.
    Chua, S. J.
    Mol, B. W.
    Longobardi, S.
    Yin, X.
    D'Hooghe, T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2023, 29 (03) : 307 - 326
  • [48] Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT)
    Lainas, Trifon G.
    Sfontouris, Ioannis A.
    Zorzovilis, Ioannis Z.
    Petsas, George K.
    Lainas, George T.
    Alexopoulou, Efthymia
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (03) : 683 - 689
  • [49] Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles
    Toftager, M.
    Bogstad, J.
    Bryndorf, T.
    Lossl, K.
    Roskaer, J.
    Holland, T.
    Praetorius, L.
    Zedeler, A.
    Nilas, L.
    Pinborg, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (06) : 1253 - 1264
  • [50] Ovarian stimulation in women with high and low body mass index: GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist
    Kumbak, Banu
    Akbas, Hande
    Sahin, Levent
    Karlikaya, Guvenc
    Karagozolu, Hale
    Kahraman, Semra
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (03) : 314 - 319