GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the efficacy of depot GnRH agonist protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with repeated IVF failure: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Tingting
    Liu, Xiaoping
    Yang, Xing
    Wang, Ningning
    Wang, Yanfang
    Li, Wei
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    Huang, Rui
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (05) : 1299 - 1306
  • [32] Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined With Multiple-Dose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol for Patients With "Genuine" Poor Response Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Kirshenbaum, Michal
    Galiano, Valentina
    Elkan-Miller, Tal
    Zilberberg, Eran
    Haas, Jigal
    Nahum, Ravit
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [33] A novel GnRH-antagonist protocol by switching to medroxyprogesterone when patients being at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during ovarian stimulation
    Huang, Ting-Chi
    Lin, Yu-Hung
    Pan, Song-Po
    Tu, Yi-An
    Huang, Chu-Chun
    Chen, Mei-Jou
    Hwang, Jiann-Loung
    Chen, Shee-Uan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 119 (11) : 1642 - 1649
  • [34] Controlled ovarian stimulation for endometriosis patients with ultra-long GnRH-agonist or GnRH-antagonist protocols: A retrospective study by propensity score matching
    Chen, Qingfen
    Du, Shengrong
    Lin, Yunhong
    Zheng, Beihong
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (05) : 1366 - 1374
  • [35] The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Chen, Cai
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Zhang, Shu
    Yu, Qilin
    Yang, Ping
    Hu, Jun
    Wang, Cong-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 6 (02): : 258 - 266
  • [36] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [37] Elevated progesterone during ovarian stimulation for IVF
    Al-Azemi, M.
    Kyrou, D.
    Kolibianakis, E. M.
    Humaidan, P.
    Van Vaerenbergh, I.
    Devroey, P.
    Fatemi, H. M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 24 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [38] Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS overweight/obese patients after controlled ovarian stimulation with the GnRH antagonist protocol and frozen embryo transfer
    Chen, Rui
    Chen, Shiping
    Liu, Manting
    He, Hua
    Xu, Haiyan
    Liu, Hanyan
    Du, Hongzi
    Wang, Weihua
    Xia, Xuefeng
    Liu, Jianqiao
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [39] Comparing ART outcomes in women with endometriosis after GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation: a systematic review
    Kuan, Kevin K. W.
    Omoseni, Sean
    Tello, Javier A.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2023, 14
  • [40] A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
    Petersen, J. Friis
    Lokkegaard, E.
    Andersen, L. F.
    Torp, K.
    Egeberg, A.
    Hedegaard, L.
    Nysom, D.
    Andersen, A. Nyboe
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2019, 2019 (01)