GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
    Borges Chapon, Rita de Cassia
    Genro, Vanessa Krebs
    Bastos de Souza, Carlos Augusto
    da Cunha-Filho, Joao Sabino
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2021, 25 (01): : 131 - 135
  • [22] Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Ningling
    Zhu, Qianqian
    Ma, Meng
    Liang, Zhou
    Tao, Yu
    Wang, Yun
    Kuang, Yanping
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [23] Predictive factors of ovarian response to GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol: AMH and age are potential candidates
    Laqqan, Mohammed M.
    Yassin, Maged M.
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [24] Intensified ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol with agonist triggering: a prospective, clinical feasibility study
    Griesinger, Georg
    Berndt, Henriette
    Schultz, Laura
    Schultze-Mosgau, Askan
    Diedrich, Klaus
    von Otte, Soeren
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 22 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [25] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study
    Huang, Pinxiu
    Tang, Minling
    Qin, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 48 (02) : 99 - 102
  • [26] Impact of gonadotropin type on progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles
    Lawrenz, B.
    Beligotti, F.
    Engelmann, N.
    Gates, D.
    Fatemi, H. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2554 - 2560
  • [27] GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor IVF responders: a randomized clinical trial
    Prapas, Yannis
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    Panagiotidis, Yannis
    Papatheodorou, Achilleas
    Assunta, Iuliano
    Prapas, Nikos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [28] Perinatal outcome of pregnancy after GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) treatment during ovarian stimulation for conventional IVF or ICSI: a preliminary report
    Olivennes, F
    Mannaerts, B
    Struijs, M
    Bonduelle, M
    Devroey, P
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (08) : 1588 - 1591
  • [29] Clinical Comparison of Ovarian Stimulation and Luteal Support Agents in Patients Undergoing GnRH Antagonist IVF Cycles
    Miller, Charles E.
    Zbella, Edward
    Webster, Bobby W.
    Doody, Kevin J.
    Bush, Mark R.
    Collins, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 58 (3-4) : 153 - 160
  • [30] Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles
    Martinez, Francisca
    Clua, Elisabet
    Roca, Marta
    Garcia, Sandra
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (12) : 2777 - 2786