GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF
    Magdalena Piróg
    Olga Kacalska-Janssen
    Robert Jach
    Jakub Wyroba
    Bartosz Chrostowski
    Michał Ząbczyk
    Joanna Natorska
    Reproductive Sciences, 2022, 29 : 3521 - 3531
  • [2] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2742 - 2749
  • [3] The role of corifollitropin alfa in controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF in combination with GnRH antagonist
    Seyhan, Ayse
    Ata, Baris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 3 : 243 - 255
  • [4] Evaluation of GnRH antagonist pretreatment before ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol in normal ovulatory women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Yisheng
    Liu, Liling
    Qin, Jie
    Huang, Hongyi
    Xue, Lintao
    Wang, Shikai
    Tan, Weihong
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [5] GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation
    Geng, Yudi
    Xun, Yang
    Hu, Shiqiao
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Jin, Lei
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [6] A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Van Turnhout, C.
    Campo, R.
    Puttemans, P.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2012, 4 (02) : 82 - 87
  • [7] Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Zhang, Hanwang
    Zhu, Guijing
    Li, Yufeng
    Jin, Lei
    He, Long
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Yang, Ping
    Yu, Qilin
    Zhang, Shu
    Xu, Jun-Fa
    Wang, Cong-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 6 (09): : 1903 - 1910
  • [8] Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
    Broekmans, Frank J.
    Verweij, Pierre J. M.
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Mannaerts, Bernadette M. J. L.
    Witjes, Han
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (08) : 1688 - 1697
  • [9] Effectiveness of the flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol compared to the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with decreased ovarian reserve
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Yildiz, Sule
    Cekic, Sebile Guler
    Shakerian, Bahar
    Keles, Ipek
    Ata, Baris
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [10] Ovarian stimulation in IVF couples with severe male factor infertility: GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist
    Lv, Mu
    Yu, Juanjuan
    Chen, Peiqin
    Xiao, Qimeng
    Lou, Liqun
    Luo, Yifan
    Yuan, Mu
    Xu, Yuan
    Feng, Youji
    Bai, Mingzhu
    Zhang, Zhenbo
    Li, Linxia
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13